+1 -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Cody Innowhere [mailto:[email protected]] 发送时间: 2015年11月24日 17:41 收件人: [email protected] 抄送: Bobby Evans 主题: Re: [VOTE] Storm 2.0 plan
+1 for this plan. Also +1 for starting evaluation solutions of major feature differences early before starting migration to avoid unnecessary re-work. On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:26 PM, 刘键(Basti Liu) <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for this plan. > > @Taylor > Could you help to update the reference branch "jstorm-import" with latest > JStorm version(2.1.0), since some JStorm features > listed in the plan of phase 2 are not included? Thanks. > > @Bobby and the devs who are interested in this migration > We will try to add some design documents for the features related to > "JStorm evaluate/port" JIAR of phase 2 by the end of week. > If the JIRA might cause much rework during phase 2, we will also comment > the solution on relative JIRA of phase 1. Hope we can > have an evaluation together before starting migration, to avoid some > unnecessary rework. > If any comments for "JStorm" part, please feel free to tell us. > > Regards > Basti > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bobby Evans [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 5:40 AM > To: Dev > Subject: [VOTE] Storm 2.0 plan > > Sorry for spaming everyone with all the JIRA creations today. I have > filed all of the JIRA corresponding to the plan for JStorm merger listed > here. > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61328109 > The bylaws > https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/docs/documentation/BYLAWS.md > don't cover a vote on the direction of the project like this. They cover > the merger of each pull request that would be made, but not a direction > change. As such this vote is more symbolic than anything, and I would love > to hear from everyone involved. > > The current plan is to finish merging in features for a 1.0 release. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STORM/Storm+Release+1.0 > is supposed to cover this, but I think it is missing some features others > want, so please let us know if you really want to get your feature in > before this happens. As such the time frame is a bit flexible but I would > like to shoot for doing a storm-1.0 release before mid December. > After that we would begin merging in the clojure->java transition JIRA. > Once those are complete the feature freeze would be lifted and JStorm > features would be merged in along with other features. Hopefully we would > have a Storm 2.0 release by mid February to mid March, depending on how > things go. > > I am +1 on this plan (if you couldn't tell) > - Bobby > >
