[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John Fang updated STORM-1279:
-----------------------------
Attachment: Discussion about supervisor.pdf
I review the superviosor of Storm&JStorm. JStorm’s supervisor is almostly same
with Storm’s supervisor. So we can look JStorm’s supervisor for reference when
we are translating supervisor in phrase 1. But I personally hope Storm’s
supervisor can combine "synchronize-supervisor" and "sync-processes" in phrase
1. Please refer pdf for the reasons. Of course, it's just my mind. If you have
anything in your mind, I want you to come out with it.
> port backtype.storm.daemon.supervisor to java
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: STORM-1279
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1279
> Project: Apache Storm
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: storm-core
> Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
> Assignee: John Fang
> Labels: java-migration, jstorm-merger
> Attachments: Discussion about supervisor.pdf
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/storm/tree/jstorm-import/jstorm-core/src/main/java/com/alibaba/jstorm/daemon/supervisor
> as an example
> backtype.storm.event usage should be replaced with built-in java threadpools.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
