Yeah, that would be good.
(Taylor, did you mean that we'd be better to move CHANGELOG.md to official
site?)

If we decide to maintain it from asf-site branch, I think preconditions
should be met in order to let us feel more convenient than current.

   - Pushing to asf-site branch via git repo should update our official
   site.
   - Yaml files should be updated automatically.
      - Because pushing to asf-site requires checking out asf-site branch,
      modifying yaml files, and pushing to remote, and checking out
master branch
      again.

I'm curious we can resolve preconditions, at least first one.
Any updates on this, Taylor?

Any other opinions are appreciated!

- Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)

ps. Btw, if we decide to scan jira issue and create CHANGELOG, how about
adding assignee to CHANGELOG so that anyone can see huge
contributors easily?

2015-12-03 9:35 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]>:

> IMHO we should take that out of the readme, and maintain it as part of the
> website. Better yet, automate it as haohui suggested.
>
> In the website branch in git we now have a yaml file that contains all
> that information. I'd rather maintain it there, in one place, and automate
> if we can.
>
> -Taylor
>
> > On Dec 2, 2015, at 6:06 PM, 임정택 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Apache Storm project maintains committer / contributor list to
> > README.markdown
> > <https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/README.markdown> and
> resolved
> > JIRA issues to CHANGELOG.md
> > <https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md>.
> > And recently we're adding the page "People" to official web site,
> > http://storm.apache.org/contribute/People.html, which seems not be
> updated
> > already.
> >
> > Since we occasionally missed to add those things, it would be better to
> > have more convenient way to record.
> > For now updating "People" seems annoying since we should update site via
> > applying patch and committing to SVN repo.
> > Do we feel that is it convenient to maintain these to git repo? Are there
> > more convenient ways to maintain? Could WIKI be more convenient way?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>



-- 
Name : 임 정택
Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior

Reply via email to