Github user d2r commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/921#discussion_r47985380
--- Diff:
storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/scheduler/resource/strategies/priority/ISchedulingPriorityStrategy.java
---
@@ -16,22 +16,26 @@
* limitations under the License.
*/
-package backtype.storm.scheduler.resource.strategies;
-
-import java.util.Collection;
-import java.util.Map;
+package backtype.storm.scheduler.resource.strategies.priority;
+import backtype.storm.scheduler.Cluster;
import backtype.storm.scheduler.Topologies;
-import backtype.storm.scheduler.ExecutorDetails;
import backtype.storm.scheduler.TopologyDetails;
-import backtype.storm.scheduler.WorkerSlot;
-import backtype.storm.scheduler.resource.RAS_Node;
+import backtype.storm.scheduler.resource.RAS_Nodes;
+import backtype.storm.scheduler.resource.User;
-/**
- * An interface to for implementing different scheduling strategies for
the resource aware scheduling
- * In the future stategies will be pluggable
- */
-public interface IStrategy {
+import java.util.Map;
+
+public interface ISchedulingPriorityStrategy {
+
+ /**
+ * initializes
+ */
+ public void prepare(Topologies topologies, Cluster cluster,
Map<String, User> userMap, RAS_Nodes nodes);
--- End diff --
Do we need `topologies` or `nodes` in the signature here, or would we get
this information from `cluster`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
