How about using Spring Boot & Jersey for writing this .  Spring Boot will
give us packaged  jar which once executed will bring up its own embedded
server (Jetty or Tomcat or some other ) . Although Spring Boot has some
disadvantages as well , but worth investigating this option too .


Any thoughts??

Thanks
Ankur

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Bobby Evans <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Yes, we need to pick something.  I have used Jersey in the past and I
> think it is fairly decent.  I have never used RESTEasy, but it is more or
> less the same API, so either one is fine with me, but Jersey is my vote
> just because of experience.
>
> You should keep in mind that we are currently on a very old version of
> jetty, and I am not sure if newer libraries will work with it.  But also
> the old versions of ring and hiccup that we use don't support newer jetty
> versions either.
>
> I personally think that now would be a good time to separate out the UI
> into a separate package + classpath.  This would allow us to package the UI
> as both a war with embedded jetty as a default option to run it; start from
> scratch with up to date versions of Jetty, Jersey/RESTEasy, and JAXB; and
> upgrade the different servers/components one at a time instead of all at
> once.  The DRPC server also uses the embedded jetty and exposes a REST
> interface, and that is going to be a harder one to tease out so it should
> probably be the last one to go.
>  - Bobby
>
>     On Tuesday, February 23, 2016 3:40 AM, 伍翀(云邪) <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>  Hi all, I’m planning to move UI/REST service and logviewer to Java, which
> means that we need to pick some alternatives for ring and hiccup.
> So the first thing is to pick up a REST framework.
> For the REST APIs, I think Jersey is a good choice (RESTEasy is fine too).
> It’s easy to develop and good performance.
> Now logviewer use hiccup to return HTML we build ourselves, but it’s hard
> to debug and maintain. So in my opinion, it’s better to replace it with
> static HTML + REST like regular UI.
> Please let me know what you think.
> – Jark Wu
>
>
>

Reply via email to