[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15217702#comment-15217702
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1279:
---------------------------------------
Github user hustfxj commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1257#issuecomment-203337583
@revans2 ok, I will file the JIRAs about the local_supervisor.clj and
"remove localSyncProcess" after porting worker.clj. I am not sure whether
someone is using the getAssignmentId(), although I agree with @zhuoliu .
> port backtype.storm.daemon.supervisor to java
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: STORM-1279
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1279
> Project: Apache Storm
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: storm-core
> Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
> Assignee: John Fang
> Labels: java-migration, jstorm-merger
> Attachments: Discussion about supervisor.pdf
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/storm/tree/jstorm-import/jstorm-core/src/main/java/com/alibaba/jstorm/daemon/supervisor
> as an example
> backtype.storm.event usage should be replaced with built-in java threadpools.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
