I am -0 on releasing with a failing test, especially with a fix in hand.

On 4/4/16, 10:50 AM, "P. Taylor Goetz" <[email protected]> wrote:

>The question at this point is whether we want to cancel the release vote
>and cut a new RC, or move forward with this one.
>
>I don’t see the test issue as critical ― users will still be able to
>build the software with the `-DskipTests=true` flag. I also feel that
>once the 1.0 release is out we will go into a phase where we release
>updates (e.g. 1.0.x, 1.x) at a relatively rapid rate.
>
>I could go either way. What does everyone else think?
>
>-Taylor
>
>
>> On Apr 2, 2016, at 10:51 PM, Harsha <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> For rc2  please include STORM-1670 as well. Source distribution is
>> important as well.
>> -Harsha
>> 
>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016, at 01:02 AM, Jungtaek Lim wrote:
>>> Here's my test,
>>> 
>>> - testing with source distribution : FAIL
>>>  - unzip : OK
>>>  - building from source dist : FAIL
>>>    - how to build: running `mvn -P all-tests clean install` on unzipped
>>> source dist.
>>>    - Test resource files (.log) are excluded from source distribution,
>>> which makes logviewer-test failing.
>>>      - filed issue : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1677
>>>      and
>>> submit a patch via pull request
>>>    - after applying PR, tests are all passed.
>>> 
>>> - testing with binary distribution (one machine) : OK
>>>  - launch daemons : OK
>>>  - run RollingTopWords (local) : OK (with minor issue)
>>>    - process doesn't terminate until killing manually or pressing Ctrl
>>>+
>>>    C
>>>  - run RollingTopWords (remote) : OK
>>>    - activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill : OK
>>>    - logviewer (worker dir, daemon dir) : OK
>>>    - change log level : OK
>>>    - thread dump, heap dump, restart worker : OK
>>>  - run WordCountTopology (remote) : OK
>>>    - multiple workers and multi-lang bolt
>>> 
>>> Minor but just leaving note: I saw /log (logviewer) throwing HTTP
>>>STATUS
>>> 500 sometimes, but I can't reproduce it. At that time, deep-search
>>> doesn't
>>> work at that topology, too.
>>> 
>>> Total
>>> - source distribution: -1
>>> - binary distribution: +1
>>> 
>>> I don't know how it is important to build with source distribution, but
>>> we
>>> can address STORM-1677 and initiate voting RC2 immediately although we
>>> think it's a 'blocker' issue.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>> 
>>> 2016년 4월 2일 (토) 오전 8:50, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]>님이 작성:
>>> 
>>>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 1.0.0 (rc1)
>>>> 
>>>> Full list of changes in this release:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHAN
>>>>GELOG.md;hb=787e4a6c375d290f724e59b3d8ebe34806ccd0d5
>>>> 
>>>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v1.0.0:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=45b1b14840
>>>>1fd05f0f79cc7abdf6b5c7fc43df20;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2
>>>>b29
>>>> 
>>>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.0.0/apache-
>>>>storm-1.0.0-src.tar.gz
>>>> 
>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>>> 
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.0.0/
>>>> 
>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS
>>>>;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>>> 
>>>> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1027/
>>>> 
>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 1.0.0.
>>>> 
>>>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>>>> 
>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>> 
>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 1.0.0
>>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release. This is a major
>>>> milestone of which we should all be proud.
>>>> 
>>>> This is not an April fools joke. ;)
>>>> 
>>>> -Taylor
>>>> 
>

Reply via email to