[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

P. Taylor Goetz updated STORM-841:
----------------------------------
    Affects Version/s: 2.0.0
                       0.9.6
                       1.0.0
                       0.10.0

> Thread-safeness of OutputCollector has documented contrary to two official 
> doc.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-841
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-841
>             Project: Apache Storm
>          Issue Type: Documentation
>          Components: documentation
>    Affects Versions: 0.10.0, 1.0.0, 0.9.6, 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Jungtaek Lim
>            Assignee: Jungtaek Lim
>            Priority: Critical
>
> There're some issues with documentation.
> http://storm.apache.org/documentation/Concepts.html says
> {quote}
> Its perfectly fine to launch new threads in bolts that do processing 
> asynchronously. OutputCollector is thread-safe and can be called at any time.
> {quote}
> and http://storm.apache.org/documentation/Troubleshooting.html says
> {quote}
> This is caused by having multiple threads issue methods on the 
> OutputCollector. All emits, acks, and fails must happen on the same thread. 
> One subtle way this can happen is if you make a IBasicBolt that emits on a 
> separate thread. IBasicBolt's automatically ack after execute is called, so 
> this would cause multiple threads to use the OutputCollector leading to this 
> exception. When using a basic bolt, all emits must happen in the same thread 
> that runs execute.
> {quote}
> It is a contradiction, and at least for now OutputCollector is not 
> thread-safe.
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@storm.incubator.apache.org/msg00939.html
> Since newbie of Storm users may think Concepts page as "should read and keep 
> it mind", it is some kind of critical that that such important documentation 
> page has wrong content.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to