[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15272783#comment-15272783
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-433:
--------------------------------------

Github user abhishekagarwal87 commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/236#issuecomment-217232912
  
    I will do that Eric. I am using 
https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/metric/internal/LatencyStatAndMetric.java
 to store the windowed values. It is easy to add the instantaneous values in 
the result map so that is not a problem. I will put a screenshot and the PR 
soon. May be that will clear the confusion. 


> Give users visibility to the depth of queues at each bolt
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-433
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-433
>             Project: Apache Storm
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: storm-core
>            Reporter: Dane Hammer
>            Assignee: Kyle Nusbaum
>            Priority: Minor
>
> I envision being able to browse the Storm UI and see where queues of tuples 
> are backing up.
> Today if I see latencies increasing at a bolt, it may not be due to anything 
> specific to that bolt, but that it is backed up behind an overwhelmed bolt 
> (which has too low of parallelism or too high of latency).
> I would expect this could use sampling like the metrics reported to the UI 
> today, and just retrieve data from netty about the state of the queues. I 
> wouldn't imagine supporting zeromq on the first pass.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to