I'm also think we shouldn't maintain 0.10.x branch -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Cody Innowhere [mailto:e.neve...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2016年5月9日 19:42 收件人: dev@storm.apache.org 主题: Re: [DISCUSSION] Version lines of 1.x
I'm also +1 for maintaining 1.x branch & master and not maintaining 0.10.x branch. On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Abhishek Agarwal <abhishc...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1. There is lot development effort pending against 1.x branch which > +will > get unblocked with 1.1.0 branch. I am assuming, we will not introduce > any backward incompatible changes in the new branch. But what will be > the release timeline of 1.1.0? Many of the PRs affect small portion of code. > Back porting these minor improvements as well as bugs into three > branches will be counter productive. We might as well work with 1.0.x > and keep pushing the changes there. > > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > What a coincidence! :) > > > > My feeling is that this issue would be another representation of > > 'drop further releases of 0.x'. > > > > If we want to have minor and bugfix version separated, we would have > > at least 3 branches, master (for 2.0), 1.1.x, 1.0.x. I'm seeing that > > not all bugfixes are applied to 0.10.x when we're pointing > > 1.x-branch as next release, which means even maintaining 3 branches > > are not easy. (It should be addressed if we maintain two 1.x version > > lines.) Moreover, package name change makes us a bit bothering to > > backport into 0.10.x. > > > > So, I'm sorry for 0.x users but I'm in favor of not maintaining > > 0.10.x branch. > > I'm curious what we all think about this, too. > > > > 2016년 5월 9일 (월) 오전 11:10, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > > > > > Perfect timing as I was thinking about similar things. > > > > > > The new metrics APIs being proposed against the 1.x branch would > > > be an > > API > > > addition, and IMO should bump the minor version when added. I'd be > > > +1 > for > > > that. > > > > > > I guess it comes down to how many version branches do we want to > support? > > > We may need to divide and conquer to support that. > > > > > > -Taylor > > > > > > > On May 8, 2016, at 9:51 PM, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi devs, > > > > > > > > I have a feeling that we recently try to respect semantic > > > > versioning, > > at > > > > least separating feature updates and bugfixes. > > > > > > > > Recently we released 1.0.0 and 1.0.1 continuously, which was OK > > > > since > > it > > > > addressed performance regressions and critical bugs. I'm curious > > > > that > > we > > > > want to maintain minor version line and bugfix version line for > > > > 1.x > > > version > > > > lines. (meaning two version lines for 1.x) > > > > > > > > In fact, we discussed to freeze the feature during releasing > > > > 2.0.0, > but > > > we > > > > don't have timeframe for 2.0.0 and phase 1 is not completed yet, > > > > so I > > > don't > > > > think we can freeze developing or improving the features for 1.x > lines. > > > > > > > > There're many pending pull requests for 1.x (and master, maybe) > > > > but > not > > > > sure I can merge them into 1.x-branch. In order to address them > > > > we > > should > > > > settle this. > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) > > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Abhishek Agarwal >
