This thread was forgotten, and I think I was wrong since I also hate the
verbose logging now :)

I'm clicking two mails for one new comment from github, which is really bad.
I strongly agree with Erik, and linking github PR with JIRA is enough for
me.

2015년 9월 22일 (화) 오후 6:06, 임정택 <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성:

> Matthias,
> Personally I can't turn off github notification because of I'm also
> collaborator of Jedis, which repository is belong to Github. ;(
>
> I just wish to reduce notifications via same event (Github event &
> JIRA automatic posting) from dev. mailing list.
> Actually I don't have strong opinion about this. Just a wish. :)
>
>
> 2015-09-22 17:23 GMT+09:00 Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org>:
>
>> On Github, you can disable mail notification about each comment in your
>> profile configuration (at least for you personal email address -- I
>> guess it still goes over the mailing list)
>>
>> Profile -> Settings -> Notification Center
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> On 09/22/2015 03:21 AM, Erik Weathers wrote:
>> > Sure, STORM-*.  ;-)
>> >
>> > Here's a good example:
>> >
>> >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329
>> >
>> > Compare that to this one:
>> >
>> >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-404
>> >
>> > STORM-404 has a bunch of human-created comments, but it's readable
>> since it
>> > has no github-generated comments.  STORM-329 however intermixes the
>> human
>> > comments with the github ones.  It's really hard to read through.
>> >
>> > To be clear, it's not that it's *confusing* per se -- it's that the
>> > behavior is *cluttering* the comments, making it harder to see any
>> > human-created comments since any JIRA issue with a PR will usually end
>> up
>> > with many automated comments.
>> >
>> > BTW, I totally agree that linking from the JIRA issue to the github PR
>> is
>> > important!  Would be even nicer if the github PRs also directly linked
>> back
>> > to the JIRA issue with a clickable link.
>> >
>> > - Erik
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:03 PM, 임정택 <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Erik,
>> >>
>> >> I think verbose logging of PR comments could be OK. I didn't
>> experience any
>> >> confusing.
>> >> Maybe referring sample JIRA issues could help us to understand.
>> >>
>> >> But I'm also open to change cause other projects already have been
>> doing.
>> >> (for example, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10474)
>> >>
>> >> In addition to SPARK has been doing, I'd like to still leave some
>> events on
>> >> github PR to JIRA issue, too.
>> >>
>> >> Btw, the thing I'm really annoyed is multiple mail notifications on
>> each
>> >> github comment.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>> >>
>> >> 2015-09-22 9:15 GMT+09:00 Erik Weathers <eweath...@groupon.com>:
>> >>
>> >>> I find that these comments majorly distract from any discussion that
>> may
>> >>> occur in the JIRA issues themselves.   What value are these
>> providing?  I
>> >>> guess just insurance against GitHub being unavailable or going away?
>> But
>> >>> that doesn't seem worth the distraction cost.  Is there any
>> possibility
>> >> of
>> >>> removing this spamminess, or somehow putting them into attachments
>> within
>> >>> the JIRA issues so that they aren't directly in the comments?
>> >>>
>> >>> - Erik
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Name : 임 정택
>> >> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
>> >> Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
>> >> LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Name : 임 정택
> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
> Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
> LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
>

Reply via email to