I disagree. If I have something that uses guava x.y and storm moves to guava
y.z now my topology will no longer run. It is not that minor of a change.
- Bobby
On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 2:01 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]>
wrote:
On May 18, 2016, at 2:46 PM, Bobby Evans <[email protected]> wrote:
If this is for 1.x then we might want to go to 1.1, not sure what the policy is
for adding something new to the classpath.
- Bobby
There was a discussion thread around this. My feeling is that for 1.x, since we
are adding APIs we should bump the minor version (i.e. 1.1.x).
I don’t think adding something to the classpath warrants a minor version bump
unless it adds something to a *Storm* API.
-Taylor
