Hi walid,

you can set no.of workers per topology, in your case it is 2. you have 4
typologies and each one has 2 i.e 8 worker slots required to run 4
typologies.
Do you have enough worker slots ? How many supervisor instances are running
? How many workers in total ?
You can find this information in STORM UI.

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Walid Aljoby <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Manu,
>
> I do not need more slots because the topology I am running is only three
> executors.
> However, Is it possible to set number of slots/supervisor to be more than
> four to run as an example more than four typologies.
>
>
> Thanks
> --
> WA
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Manu Zhang <[email protected]>
> *To:* Walid Aljoby <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <
> [email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 6, 2016 6:43 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: Max supervisor slots
>
> Do you have more required slots than available ? Topologies do not share
> slots in storm.
>
> Manu
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:50 PM Walid Aljoby <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Manu,
> Number of workers is only two per topology.
> Thanks--WA      From: Manu Zhang <[email protected]>
>  To: Walid Aljoby <[email protected]>; User <[email protected]>;
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>  Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 5:32 PM
>  Subject: Re: Max supervisor slots
>
> Hi Walid,
> What's the number of workers you set for each topology ?
> Manu
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:44 PM Walid Aljoby <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
> I have a question please about the maximum typologies that can be
> processed by Apache storm production cluster?
> Although the number of slots per supervisor is four(6700,6701,6702,6703),
> but when I submitted four typologies, I noted only three were running in
> parallel, while one of the typologies does not assigned to any worker. So I
> was wondering if someone help why slot 6703 does not appear to be active in
> the cluster..
> Thanks and Regards,
> --WA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Thanks & Regards
Rajasekhar

Reply via email to