+1 for documenting and releasing. -Harsha On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:04 AM Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 to the latter. > > I'm in favor of documenting the change to release note, and also docs so > that website can be reflected. The users who are affected to the change > wouldn't be much, since using dependency management tool (Maven, Gradle, > and so on) has been recommended for creating topology jar. > > For me it's not a blocker for release. > > Arun, I initiated another thread to discuss moving non-connectors to the > top directory. > Could you cast your vote? If you are still not satisfied with excluding > jars you can cast -0 or even -1. > > - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) > > 2017년 3월 23일 (목) 오후 10:43, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > > > Do we want to cancel this RC in order to better document the changes, or > > will documenting it in the release announcement suffice for now (provided > > documentation is added for subsequent releases)? > > > > I’m partial to the latter, but am open to others’ opinions. > > > > -Taylor > > > > > > > On Mar 22, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> > > wrote: > > > > > > +1 I built form the tag and ran using a single node cluster. > > > The examples and external components are excluded because they are > > huge. Because of shading they we distribute the same copy of them > multiple > > times. > > > I agree with Alexandre. We should document this change better, because > > it is confusing for people to get a release that used to have these in > it, > > but does not any more. > > > > > > > > > - Bobby > > > > > > On Tuesday, March 21, 2017, 10:46:38 PM CDT, Arun Mahadevan < > > ar...@apache.org> wrote:Verified the artifacts. Compiled examples and > ran > > some sample topologies. Looks good. > > > > > > BTW, why are the external modules excluded from the binaries (the .zip > > and .tar.gz). Isn’t it better if the binary distribution includes them? > > Maybe it was already discussed but I am missing it. The sql directory > > however seems to include the jars so it looks inconsistent. > > > > > > - Arun > > > > > > > > > On 3/22/17, 12:56 AM, "P. Taylor Goetz" <ptgo...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > >> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 1.1.0 (rc3) > > >> > > >> Full list of changes in this release: > > >> > > >> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;h=68fbab3c4f91359bd397d93a157830542839b002;hb=e40d213de7067f7d3aa4d4992b81890d8ed6ff31 > > >> > > >> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v1.1.0: > > >> > > >> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=7fa62404feb6b86b3143c851b46237580720eb6b;hb=e40d213de7067f7d3aa4d4992b81890d8ed6ff31 > > >> > > >> The source archive being voted upon can be found here: > > >> > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.1.0-rc3/apache-storm-1.1.0-src.tar.gz > > >> > > >> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here: > > >> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.1.0-rc3/ > > >> > > >> The release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > >> > > >> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd > > >> > > >> The Nexus staging repository for this release is: > > >> > > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1047 > > >> > > >> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 1.1.0. > > >> > > >> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release. > > >> > > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > >> > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 1.1.0 > > >> [ ] 0 No opinion > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > >> > > >> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release. > > >> > > >> -Taylor > > > > > > > >
