+1 to maintain 3 version lines, though we may want to look at what we can do for storm mesos, which I think it currently stuck on 1.0.x.
2018-02-13 20:17 GMT+01:00 Hugo Da Cruz Louro <hlo...@hortonworks.com>: > +1 to maintain 3 version lines. Let’s properly announce that in our portal > and users list such that users know what’s coming. > > Agree with focusing on 2.0 which has a lot of improvements, rather than > 1.x, x >= 3. > > > On Feb 13, 2018, at 10:43 AM, Alexandre Vermeerbergen < > avermeerber...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > +1 (non binding) to maintaining less version lines, provided that > > 1.2.x branch is maintained long enough to allow progressive adoption > > of 2.x > > > > Alexandre Vermeerbergen > > > > 2018-02-13 19:38 GMT+01:00 Priyank Shah <ps...@hortonworks.com>: > >> +1 to maintaining 3 version lines as suggested by Jungtaek. > >> > >> On 2/13/18, 9:51 AM, "Arun Iyer on behalf of Arun Mahadevan" < > ai...@hortonworks.com on behalf of ar...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> +1 to maintain 3 version lines. > >> > >> I think the next focus should be 2.0.0 than 1.3.0. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 2/12/18, 11:40 PM, "Jungtaek Lim" <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi devs, > >>> > >>> I've noticed that we are providing 4 different version lines (1.1.x, > 1.0.x, > >>> 0.10.x, 0.9.x) in download page, and I expect we will add one more for > >>> 1.2.0. Moreover, we have one more develop version line (2.0.0 - master) > >>> which most of development happens there. > >>> > >>> Recently we're releasing 3 version lines (1.0.6 / 1.1.2 / 1.2.0) > >>> simultaneously and it took heavy effort to track all the RCs and > verify all > >>> of them. I guess release manager would take more overhead of > releasing, and > >>> it doesn't make sense for me if we continue maintaining all of them. > >>> > >>> Ideally I'd like to propose maintaining three version lines: 2.0.0 > (next > >>> major) / 1.3.0 (next minor - may not happen) / 1.2.1 (next bugfix) and > >>> making others EOL (that respects semantic versioning and even other > >>> projects tend to maintain only two version lines), but if someone > feels too > >>> aggressive, I propose at least we explicitly announce EOL to 0.x > version > >>> lines and get rid of any supports (downloads) for them. > >>> > >>> Would like to hear your opinion. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) > >> > >> > >> > > > >
