I agree, and looking through the JIRAs against 2.0, I would say a majority of 
the ones marked critical are not critical.

I’m +1 on moving forward with a 2.0 release, but will give others time to 
respond with any JIRAs they think should be included.

> p.s. I don't want to create branch-2.x or branch-2.0.x until absolutely
> necessary, I don't see any major features with pull requests up but if you
> do run across one please send something out before merging it in, so we can
> set up the branches properly at that time.


Agree. We can always branch off the release tag/commit.

-Taylor


> On Sep 10, 2018, at 12:25 PM, Bobby Evans <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> It has been nearly a month since this was originally sent out, and this is
> not the first of these kinds of emails to go out about a 2.0.0 release.  I
> think we have made a lot of really good progress on getting ready for a 2.0
> release, and I really would like to see it happen before another month
> passes.
> 
> We have a 2.0 based deploy in some of our staging clusters, currently
> following the master branch with a little that is Yahoo specific on top. We
> would like to start pushing towards production with it soon.
> 
> There are a few issues that we are aware of.
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20STORM%20AND%20affectedVersion%20in%20(2.0.0)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> 
> There are no blockers still open, and only 4 issues listed as critical.
> 
> If others have any open issues that feel need to be addressed prior to a
> 2.0.0 release please respond to this with the JIRA number.  I would like to
> set a goal/tentative date of Sep 17th (one week from today) to put together
> a release candidate for a 2.0.0 release, and unless there are major
> blockers that show up I think we can do it.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bobby Evans
> 
> p.s. I don't want to create branch-2.x or branch-2.0.x until absolutely
> necessary, I don't see any major features with pull requests up but if you
> do run across one please send something out before merging it in, so we can
> set up the branches properly at that time.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:47 PM Jungtaek Lim <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> I'd like to say first, thanks Stig to take up remaining issues. Thanks to
>> his efforts, according to the epic, we have only one major issue left:
>> porting UI to Java [1], and pull request [2] is available for that.
>> There're another issues [3] [4] targeting 2.0.0 (since it is backward
>> incompatible) but they are all about removing deprecated things, so easier
>> to be reviewed and make decisions.
>> 
>> Once we have a patch for that now, IMHO it would be good to review and ship
>> in 2.0.0 if it wouldn't take a month or so. We could do some sanity tests
>> in parallel, so waiting for UI port would not block much time on releasing
>> Storm 2.0.0.
>> 
>> - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>> 
>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1311
>> 2. https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2752
>> 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2947
>> 4. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3156
>> 
>> 
>> 2018년 7월 11일 (수) 오전 5:12, Alexandre Vermeerbergen <
>> [email protected]>님이
>> 작성:
>> 
>>> +1 would love to try it when an RC is avail!
>>> 
>>> Alexandre Vermeerbergen
>>> 
>>> 2018-07-10 21:15 GMT+02:00 Arun Mahadevan <[email protected]>:
>>>> +1 to get it out soon.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 7/10/18, 11:52 AM, "P. Taylor Goetz" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1 Sounds good to me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Taylor
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 2:18 AM, Jungtaek Lim <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I hopefully have a time to sort out issues regarding Storm 2.0.0 and
>>> link
>>>>>> to epic issue.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2714
>>>>>> (require login to Apache JIRA to see issues in epic)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I guess we are close to the release, mostly left reviewing some
>> pending
>>>>>> pull requests, and some manual sanity tests.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Given that master branch is relatively stabilized for Travis CI
>> build,
>>> as
>>>>>> well as style check and Java port make codebase better (at least for
>>> me), I
>>>>>> would really want to make Storm 2.0.0 released sooner than later, and
>>> rely
>>>>>> majorly on 2.x version line.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So I would propose dev folks to concentrate on remaining tasks for
>>> Storm
>>>>>> 2.0.0 till we announce release. WDYT?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to