Fix at https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3000.

Den ons. 17. apr. 2019 kl. 12.51 skrev Stig Rohde Døssing <
[email protected]>:

> -1
>
> Upgrading to Zookeeper 3.4.14 added a transitive dependency on
> spotbugs-annotations, which is LGPL licensed. I filed a bug for it at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3381, and a matching one for
> Zookeeper https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3367.
>
> Sorry, should have caught this during the PR. In the longer run, I'll see
> if we can automate license checking a bit more, it would be nice if Travis
> failed unless the license files are up to date, so it is obvious when stuff
> like this happens.
>
>
> Den tir. 16. apr. 2019 kl. 20.42 skrev P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]
> >:
>
>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc6)
>>
>> Full list of changes in this release:
>>
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc6/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>>
>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
>>
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=fb277b90c8488aec017eed066a9fd221a247e4f9;hb=ac046ee6170d982f98b66f3ed21a82f979707d68
>>
>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc6/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
>>
>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc6/
>>
>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>
>> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1077
>>
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
>>
>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>>
>> -Taylor
>
>

Reply via email to