Hello, Ah sorry: I indeed accepted Richard's invitation to join as a PMC, but I thought I had to wait for some formal confirmation before I could cast a binding vote - hence my mention as "non-binding " with my vote.
Should I recast it, or I am right to wait for some formal annouce of my PMC status? Alexandre Le sam. 5 août 2023, 19:16, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> a écrit : > Hey Bipin, > > think it is sufficient, if you put your own +1 to the original thread. > Given that Alexandre has also accepted his invitation, we should be good > now. > > Thanks for doing the release! > > Gruß > Richard > > > > > Am 5. August 2023 19:09:40 MESZ schrieb Bipin Prasad < > bipinpra...@apache.org>: > >Richard, > > Thanks for this note on the vote process. I will ask for further > votes on the to ensure compliance - even though RC4 was moved to release > area. Will send out an email with the new locations. Once an additional > vote is registered, I will send out the vote result email. > > > >--Bipin > > > >On 2023/08/04 20:05:35 Richard Zowalla wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> > >> During the last release vote, I noticed the following things that we > >> should do better next time to adhere to the ASF release guidelines > >> [1,2,3]: > >> > >> - We need at least 3 (binding) votes for a release. A binding vote > >> originates from PMC members only (although community is encouraged to > >> also cast non-binding votes and test the binaries). For 2.5.0, we only > >> had 2 (binding) votes for RC4 and an implicit one (at least I assume > >> it) by our release manager, which would need to be cast next time, so > >> we can formally do the release according to the foundation's policies. > >> > >> - A successful vote should be followed by a [VOTE] [RESULT] mail to > >> indicate, that the vote was successful and the release process > >> continues. > >> > >> - If multiple RC's are needed to do a release, we would need to sent a > >> mail with [VOTE] [CANCELLED] to indicate the failed attempt and start a > >> new mail thread with the next release candidate. This make the process > >> more transparent to everyone. > >> > >> No blaming, just my observation. I think, that we can do better next > >> time :) > >> > >> Gruß > >> Richard > >> > >> [1] https://infra.apache.org/release-publishing.html > >> [2] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html > >> [3] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > >> >
