Yet another finding on my side to "not call yet for vote on a Storm 2.6.0", we have some CVEs and we shoudn't release a version having known CVEs.
For example, we have find . -name "commons-text*jar" -print ./lib-webapp/commons-text-1.9.jar ./external/storm-autocreds/commons-text-1.10.0.jar The second one is okay from https://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2022-42889/ perspective, but not the first one. I will continue checking if there are other CVEs... Thanks, Alexandre Le mar. 7 nov. 2023 à 17:43, Alexandre Vermeerbergen <avermeerber...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Oh thank you very much for this cherry-pinking, I was too busy doing > other unrelated stuff.. > > Le mar. 7 nov. 2023 à 17:35, Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org> a écrit : > > > > I cherry-picked your commit and put that on master > > > > > > Am Dienstag, dem 07.11.2023 um 17:25 +0100 schrieb Richard Zowalla: > > > You pushed on your own branch. You would need to push to apache/storm > > > main branch or open a PR ;-) > > > > > > Am Samstag, dem 04.11.2023 um 10:36 +0100 schrieb Alexandre > > > Vermeerbergen: > > > > Just did a 'git push' with that trivial fix... is that enough? > > > > > > > > Le sam. 4 nov. 2023 à 09:34, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> > > > > a > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > You can do as you like ;-) > > > > > > > > > > Am 4. November 2023 08:54:48 MEZ schrieb Alexandre Vermeerbergen > > > > > <avermeerber...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > I mean : > > > > > > > > > > > > Can I keep using my > > > > > > 'STORM-3958-Capacity-to-set-St > > > > > > orm-UI's-title-in-conf/storm.yaml' > > > > > > branch to push this fix, or should I create a new one? > > > > > > > > > > > > Le sam. 4 nov. 2023 à 08:53, Alexandre Vermeerbergen > > > > > > <avermeerber...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you keep using my > > > > > > > 'STORM-3958-Capacity-to-set-Storm-UI's-title-in- > > > > > > > conf/storm.yaml' > > > > > > > branch to push this fix, or should I create a new one? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le sam. 4 nov. 2023 à 08:14, Richard Zowalla > > > > > > > <rich...@zowalla.com> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just push a fix for it (referencing the original issue) ;-) > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > we hadn't a release in between, so not a big deal. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 4. November 2023 08:01:54 MEZ schrieb Alexandre > > > > > > > > Vermeerbergen <avermeerber...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > Temporary workaround for the Storm UI title's regression: > > > > > > > > > run this > > > > > > > > > command on the title-template.html file (in > > > > > > > > > storm-stable/public/templates directory) after having > > > > > > > > > extracted the > > > > > > > > > binary archive: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sed -i 's/{{ui\.title}}/{{title}}/' title-template.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Again sorry for having introduced this regression. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alexandre > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le sam. 4 nov. 2023 à 07:52, Alexandre Vermeerbergen > > > > > > > > > <avermeerber...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Updates regarding my test with Storm 2.6.0 Snapshot > > > > > > > > > > 2023/11/02: > > > > > > > > > > 1. I have modified my KO bolts using this pattern in > > > > > > > > > > their prepare() method: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > long cacheMaxSize = > > > > > > > > > > Long.parseLong(stormConf.get(ConfKeys.SVC_DEF_CACHE_SIZ > > > > > > > > > > E) > > > > > > > > > > .toString()); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > long cacheMaxSize = (Long) > > > > > > > > > > stormConf.get(ConfKeys.SVC_DEF_CACHE_SIZE); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. I have found the cause of the regression in loss of > > > > > > > > > > 'Storm UI' > > > > > > > > > > title at the top left-hand side of all Storm UI's > > > > > > > > > > pages. > > > > > > > > > > This is a mistake of mine in this PR: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3580/commits/0320ee6f2d367086b973b504a976ae6aff853ccd > > > > > > > > > > More precisely, at line 19 of this file: > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3580/commits/0320ee6f2d367086b973b504a976ae6aff853ccd#diff-6d3a4162a8af826a25a2b8cd6763c08e9bc5165b736b45890b84fa50597d7481 > > > > > > > > > > we must have: > > > > > > > > > > <h1><a href="/">{{title}}</a></h1> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h1><a href="/">{{ui.title}}</a></h1> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think I missed this during my tests because of > > > > > > > > > > browser's cache > > > > > > > > > > (bad excuse, I know...): probably I tested by-patching > > > > > > > > > > my > > > > > > > > > > deployed > > > > > > > > > > Storm cluster, and I finally forgot to checkout this > > > > > > > > > > latest change of > > > > > > > > > > my delivery. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I had to use "private navigation" to make sure this > > > > > > > > > > time it fixes this issue > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What would be the quickest way for this very simple fix > > > > > > > > > > to be delivered ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Alexandre > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le ven. 3 nov. 2023 à 20:57, Alexandre Vermeerbergen > > > > > > > > > > <avermeerber...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Richard for the analysis. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My thought on this are very simple: let me fix my own > > > > > > > > > > > old code, after > > > > > > > > > > > all this was impacting only one of my topologies, the > > > > > > > > > > > other one were > > > > > > > > > > > using more careful Integer.parseInt or > > > > > > > > > > > Integer.parseLong to avoid > > > > > > > > > > > making assumption on the way the values in the config > > > > > > > > > > > Map were > > > > > > > > > > > serialized. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My other concern with 2.6.0 Snapshot is that in Storm > > > > > > > > > > > UI, the "Storm > > > > > > > > > > > UI" title at the top left hand side of each page is > > > > > > > > > > > missing. This may > > > > > > > > > > > be the result of one of my own PR, I'll have to check > > > > > > > > > > > why... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le ven. 3 nov. 2023 à 20:23, Richard Zowalla > > > > > > > > > > > <r...@apache.org> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks for the feedback. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The main difference to 2.5.0 is, that we switched > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > JSON > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation in Utils, which relied on a > > > > > > > > > > > > super old JSON library. What is happening here is, > > > > > > > > > > > > that the new JSON > > > > > > > > > > > > library (net.minidev) behaves differently. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We can see it by writing some simple code without > > > > > > > > > > > > Storm (The related > > > > > > > > > > > > code line with the parsing is taken from Storm > > > > > > > > > > > > Utils) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Map<String, Long> conf = new HashMap<>(); > > > > > > > > > > > > conf.put("test", 100000000L); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Map<String, Object> deserTopoConf = > > > > > > > > > > > > (Map<String, > > > > > > > > > > > > Object>) > > > > > > > > > > > > JSONValue.parseWithException(JSONValue.toJSONString > > > > > > > > > > > > (c > > > > > > > > > > > > onf)); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for(Map.Entry<String, Object> e : > > > > > > > > > > > > deserTopoConf.entrySet()) { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > System.out.println(e.getValue().getClass().getSimpl > > > > > > > > > > > > eN > > > > > > > > > > > > ame()); > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This will print "Integer". Using > > > > > > > > > > > > "10000000000000000L" > > > > > > > > > > > > as a value will > > > > > > > > > > > > result in "Long". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The main issue derives from the fact, that we > > > > > > > > > > > > serialize the config map > > > > > > > > > > > > into a JSON String and parse the result. > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on the String representation, "100000000L" > > > > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > still fit into an > > > > > > > > > > > > Integer, so the parser will not use Long ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If the number is big enough, the parser will switch > > > > > > > > > > > > to a Long> >> > >> > > The old library (> 10 years > > > > > > > > > > > > old now): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > deserTopoConf = (Map<String, Object>) > > > > > > > > > > > > org.json.simple.JSONValue.parseWithException(org.js > > > > > > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > > > .simple.JSONValue. > > > > > > > > > > > > toJSONString(conf)); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for(Map.Entry<String, Object> e : > > > > > > > > > > > > deserTopoConf.entrySet()) { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > System.out.println(e.getValue().getClass().getSimpl > > > > > > > > > > > > eN > > > > > > > > > > > > ame()); > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This will print "Long". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The difference between these libraries is, that the > > > > > > > > > > > > super old > > > > > > > > > > > > org.json.simple just always returns Long as the > > > > > > > > > > > > type. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If can eventually tune the new JSON parser to > > > > > > > > > > > > something like: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > deserTopoConf = (Map<String, Object>) new > > > > > > > > > > > > JSONParser(JSONParser.BIG_DIGIT_UNRESTRICTED).parse > > > > > > > > > > > > (J > > > > > > > > > > > > SONValue= toJSONStr > > > > > > > > > > > > ing(conf), JSONValue.defaultReader.DEFAULT); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This will result in "Long" but might have other > > > > > > > > > > > > side- > > > > > > > > > > > > effects. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From my point of view, the newer JSON library works > > > > > > > > > > > > as expected > > > > > > > > > > > > (although it might break backward compatibility). > > > > > > > > > > > > Unchecked casts are always evil, imho. In your > > > > > > > > > > > > specific case, it might > > > > > > > > > > > > be more save to cast to "Number" and than invoke > > > > > > > > > > > > "longValue()" instead. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nevertheless, we might being able to restore the > > > > > > > > > > > > old > > > > > > > > > > > > behaviour by > > > > > > > > > > > > tuning the JSONParser configuration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gruß > > > > > > > > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Freitag, dem 03.11.2023 um 18:32 +0100 schrieb > > > > > > > > > > > > Alexandre > > > > > > > > > > > > Vermeerbergen: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On a side note, the Long value that "MyKOBolt" is > > > > > > > > > > > > > set by a > > > > > > > > > > > > > DefaultTopologyConfig to a value with is a > > > > > > > > > > > > > java.lang.Long instance... > > > > > > > > > > > > > hence it's surprising to see it internally > > > > > > > > > > > > > converted into a > > > > > > > > > > > > > java.lang.Integer in the Map passed to prepare() > > > > > > > > > > > > > method... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le ven. 3 nov. 2023 à 18:27, Alexandre > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vermeerbergen > > > > > > > > > > > > > <avermeerber...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found a breaking change using Apache Storm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.6.0 snapshot build > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dated 20231103 and without changing my > > > > > > > > > > > > > > topologies' code (keeping > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same big jars). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This seems to be tied to a datatype change in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Map > > > > > > > > > > > > > > argument of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > prepare() method of Bolt. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, this Bolt is KO at runtime: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public class MyKOBolt extends BaseRichBolt { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Override > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public void prepare(Map stormConf, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TopologyContext context, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OutputCollector collector) { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cacheMaxSize = (Long) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stormConf.get(ConfKeys.SVC_DEF_CACHE_SIZE); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cacheTtlMin = (Long) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stormConf.get(ConfKeys.SVC_DEF_CACHE_TTL_MIN); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as it throws this error: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2023-11-03 16:42:20.230 o.a.s.e.b.BoltExecutor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thread-14-__system-executor[-1, -1] [INFO] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Preparing bolt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __system:[-1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2023-11-03 16:42:20.193 o.a.s.u.Utils > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thread-15-evaluateTriggers-executor[11, 11] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ERROR] Async loop > > > > > > > > > > > > > > died! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Integer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > incompatible with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > java.lang.Long > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at com.acme.storm.alerting.MyKOBolt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .prepare(EvaluationBolt.java:71) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~[stormjar.jar:?] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.storm.executor.bolt.BoltExecutor.ini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > t( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BoltExecutor.java: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 128) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~[storm-client-2.6.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:2.6.0- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SNAPSHOT] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.storm.executor.bolt.BoltExecutor.cal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > l( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BoltExecutor.java: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 138) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~[storm-client-2.6.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:2.6.0- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SNAPSHOT] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.storm.executor.bolt.BoltExecutor.cal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > l( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BoltExecutor.java: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 54) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~[storm-client-2.6.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:2.6.0- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SNAPSHOT] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.storm.utils.Utils$1.run(Utils.java:3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 93 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [storm-client-2.6.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:2.6.0- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SNAPSHOT] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:857) [?:?] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whereas this bolt is fine with Storm 2.6.0: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public class MyOKBolt extends BaseBasicBolt { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Override > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public void prepare(final Map stormConf, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > final TopologyContext > > > > > > > > > > > > > > context) { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > super.prepare(stormConf, context); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this.redisPort = > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Integer.parseInt((String) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stormConf.get(ConfKeys.REDIS_PORT)); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That said, I can modify the code of "MyKOBolt" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > use same > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Integer.parseInt or Integer.parseLong trick, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's the first > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in my long history of upgrades that I have seen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > such runtime > > > > > > > > > > > > > > incompatibility. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe "MyKOBolt" was badly written since the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > beginning and I have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hit the punishment for it: is there a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > documentation which clarifies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > datatypes of the Map argument of prepare() > > > > > > > > > > > > > > method? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also worth noting: "MyKOBolt" derives from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BaseRichBolt , while > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "MyOKBolt" derives from BaseBasicBolt => could > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this have any impact > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this finding ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Last, I'm running this on Redhat Linux 8 and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IBM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Semeru JDK > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 17.0.8.1. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alexandre > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le ven. 3 nov. 2023 à 15:16, Julien Nioche > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Richard. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tried the latest snapshot with StormCrawler > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > both in local and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > deployed mode > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and did not find any issues. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will try it on a topology generating WARC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > files > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > next week to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > check that the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dependency changes on Hadoop have not broken > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Have a good week end > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Julien > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 19:25, Richard Zowalla > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <r...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Short update. Sorted out an issue with the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tar.gz/zip with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Julien today > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and re-uploaded them to the nightlies area. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This new bundle works as expected in my > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > deployment but happy to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > receive > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > additional feedback before getting up a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > first > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > release candidate > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Montag, dem 30.10.2023 um 08:21 +0100 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > schrieb Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Zowalla: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alexandre, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we are not in a hurry here :) - take as > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > much as time you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > need. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gruß > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Montag, dem 30.10.2023 um 07:50 +0100 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > schrieb Alexandre > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vermeerbergen: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Richard, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Okay, I'm more than happy to do that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > my pre-production > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cluster > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (~10 topologies) using the binary > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > artifacts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would it be OK if I can use up to end > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this week so that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > able to have enough time to check all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > potential issues that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > upgrade bring? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alexandre > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le lun. 30 oct. 2023 à 07:35, Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Zowalla > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <r...@apache.org> a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > before starting a release of 2.6.0- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SNAPSHOT, I would like > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > receive > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some feedback on the current SNAPSHOT > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > build. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just uploaded a 2.6.0-SNAPSHOT of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Storm build from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/commit/8f883086032669a8f04b09a3b312d60af5b44533 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is available via the ASF Snapshot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > repository: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can consume by adding > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <repository> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <id>apache.snapshots</id> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <name>Apache Snapshot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Repository</name> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <url> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/snap > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > shots</url> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <releases> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <enabled>false</enabled> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > </releases> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > </repository> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to your project pom. As we do not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > deploy SNAPSHOTS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > automatically, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > should be easy to just consume the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > latest SNAPSHOT. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The packaged binaries are available > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nightlies.apache.org: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://nightlies.apache.org/storm/2.6.0-SNAPSHOT/8f883086032669a8f04b09a3b312d60af5b44533/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have some minutes left: Please > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > test and report any > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > issues > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this binaries, so we can fix before > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > attempting to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The most significant changes are in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hadoop/hbase/hdfs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > upgraded from 2.x to 3.x - our own > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > test > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > coverage within > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the build > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > looks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good but would be nice to get some > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > real world use-case > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > feedback > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this. In addition, we had quite a lof > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of 3rd party > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dependency > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > upgrades. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In addition, it contains the pruning > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > external modules > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > listed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3988 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A summaryin Jira is here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314820&version=12353484 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gruß > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.digitalpebble.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #digitalpebble > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
