No worries, I'll do it and will also update the docs. After that, if you concur, I'll start the release procedure since we now have 3 binding votes.
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 at 13:36, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> wrote: > I would use sha512sum (as it's done in other ASF Projects as well). We > should update the docs. > > Am 22. Juli 2024 14:09:53 MESZ schrieb Rui Abreu <rui.ab...@gmail.com>: > >Hi Julien, > > > >Thanks for taking the time to review the release. > > > >The difference in the checksum comes down to the binaries that were used > to > >generate them. Source archives are using sha512sum whereas final packages > >are using gpg --print-md. > > > > According to the release procedures: > > > >pushd storm-dist/source/target > >sha512sum apache-storm-2.6.0-src.zip > apache-storm-2.6.0-src.zip.sha512 > >sha512sum apache-storm-2.6.0-src.tar.gz > > >apache-storm-2.6.0-src.tar.gz.sha512popd > >pushd storm-dist/binary/final-package/target > >gpg --print-md SHA512 apache-storm-2.6.0.zip > > apache-storm-2.6.0.zip.sha512 > >gpg --print-md SHA512 apache-storm-2.6.0.tar.gz > > >apache-storm-2.6.0.tar.gz.sha512pop > > > > > >Happy to fix this if the procedure is wrong. > > > >On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 at 08:34, Julien Nioche < > lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com> > >wrote: > > > >> Thanks for taking care of the release Rui. > >> > >> The signatures apache-storm-2.6.3.tar.gz.sha512 > >> < > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.6.3-rc1/apache-storm-2.6.3.tar.gz.sha512 > >> > > >> and apache-storm-2.6.3.zip.sha512 > >> < > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.6.3-rc1/apache-storm-2.6.3.zip.sha512 > >> > > >> are > >> not at the same format as the others. Can you please check that they are > >> correct and replace them if needed? > >> > >> Apart from that, +1 from me > >> > >> - checked the other signatures > >> - created a distribution from source > >> - used it to run a local topology > >> - ran a distributed cluster > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> Julien > >> > >> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 at 16:42, Rui Abreu <rui.ab...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi folks, > >> > > >> > I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache Storm 2.6.3 > release > >> > and it is ready for testing. > >> > > >> > The Nexus staging repository is here: > >> > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1112 > >> > > >> > Storm Source and Binary Release with sha512 signature files are here: > >> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.6.3-rc1/ > >> > The release artifacts are signed with the following key: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > http://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?search=rabreu&fingerprint=on&op=index > >> > in this file https://www.apache.org/dist/storm/KEYS > >> > > >> > The release was made from the Apache Storm 2.6.3 tag at: > >> > https://github.com/apache/storm/tree/v2.6.3 > >> > > >> > Full list of changes in this release: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.6.3-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html > >> > > >> > To use it in a maven build set the version for Storm to 2.6.3 and add > the > >> > following URL to your settings.xml file: > >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1112 > >> > > >> > The release was made using the Storm release process, documented on > the > >> > GitHub repository: > >> > https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/RELEASING.md > >> > > >> > Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache Storm 2.6.3. The > vote > >> is > >> > open for at least the next 72 hours. > >> > "How to vote" is described here: > >> > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/RELEASING.md#how-to-vote-on-a-release-candidate > >> > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release. > >> > > >> > Only votes from the Storm PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to > >> check > >> > the release candidate and vote. > >> > The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. > >> > > >> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm [VERSION] > >> > [ ] 0 No opinion > >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > >> > > >> > Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release. > >> > > >> > Thanks! > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> *Julien Nioche * > >> > >> > >> digitalpebble.com <http://www.digitalpebble.com/> > >> >
