I concur +1 (binding) Cheers folks
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 at 16:40, Julien Nioche <lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 for either 17 or 21 > > Julien > > On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 at 13:23, Alexandre Vermeerbergen < > avermeerber...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) even if I would love a bigger jump, i.e., to JDK 21 so as to > > open the road to the use of virtual threads for executors ! > > > > Thanks, > > Alexandre > > > > Le ven. 8 nov. 2024, 11:03, Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org> a écrit : > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > As we continue to develop Apache Storm, maintaining compatibility with > > > newer versions of Java is essential to take advantage of the performance, > > > security, and feature improvements in the Java ecosystem. > > > The current minimum Java version supported for Apache Storm development > > is > > > outdated and can limit our ability to take advantage of more modern > > > language features, libraries, and JVM enhancements. > > > > > > Therefore, I am proposing to raise the minimum Java baseline for > > > development to Java 17. This will allow us to keep pace with other major > > > frameworks (Spring, etc.) and pave the way for upgrading AMQ (JMS) > > > integration. > > > > > > Java 17 introduces many benefits, including improved garbage collection, > > > improved performance, new language features (such as pattern matching and > > > records), and a stronger security model. > > > > > > By making Java 17 the baseline for development, we will be able to > > > integrate these benefits into the codebase, streamlining dependencies, > > > reducing CI/build times and compatibility complexities. > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > Gruß > > > Richard > > > > > -- > *Julien Nioche * > > > digitalpebble.com <http://www.digitalpebble.com/>
