Ran the 2.8.9-RC1 using storm-docker.
Uploaded KafkaSpoutTopologyMainNamedTopics from storm-examples.
UI looks good, topologies are processing normally.

Verified signatures and checksum for all files

+1 (binding)

On Sat, 18 Jul 2026 at 17:23, Rui Abreu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have posted the 1st release candidate for Apache Storm 2.8.9
> release and it is ready for testing.
>
> The Nexus staging repository is here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1126
>
> Storm Source and Binary Release with sha512 signature files are here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.8.9-rc1/
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=index&fingerprint=on&search=rabreu
> in this file https://www.apache.org/dist/storm/KEYS
>
> The release was made from the Apache Storm 2.8.9 tag at:
> https://github.com/apache/storm/tree/v2.8.9
>
> Full list of changes in this release:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.8.9-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>
> To use it in a Maven build set the version for Storm to 2.8.9 and add
> the following URL to your settings.xml file:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1126
>
> The release was made using the Storm release process, documented on
> the GitHub repository:
> https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/RELEASING.md
>
> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache Storm 2.8.9. The
> vote is open for at least the next 72 hours.
>
> "How to vote" is described here:
> https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/RELEASING.md#how-to-vote-on-a-release-candidate
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>
> Only votes from the Storm PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to
> check the release candidate and vote.
> The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.8.9
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.

Reply via email to