[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13963117#comment-13963117
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-274:
--------------------------------------
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-storm/pull/60#issuecomment-39866773
If I run remoteconfvalue through python I get
```
$ storm remoteconfvalue ui.port
ui.port: 8080
```
If I call the java code directly like this patch is doing I get
```
$ storm jar bogus backtype.storm.command.config_value ui.port
...
VALUE: 8080
```
The python code replaces the VALUE: with ui.port:. Like I said I am not
sure it is critical, but it is a difference.
As for STORM-273 vs STORM-274, STORM-273 has two +1 on it so I'll just pull
it in, and then this pull request should hopefully recognize it and you won't
need to do anything.
> Add support for command remoteconfvalue in storm.cmd
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: STORM-274
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-274
> Project: Apache Storm (Incubating)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.9.2-incubating
> Reporter: Suresh Srinivas
> Attachments: STORM-274.patch
>
>
> Currently storm.cmd does not support remoteconfvalue as supported by its
> linux counterpart storm.py.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
