[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14002233#comment-14002233
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-297:
--------------------------------------
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-storm/pull/103#discussion_r12812473
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/messaging/netty/Client.java ---
@@ -84,43 +93,87 @@
// Start the connection attempt.
remote_addr = new InetSocketAddress(host, port);
- bootstrap.connect(remote_addr);
+
+ Thread flushChecker = new Thread(new Runnable() {
--- End diff --
Can we make this thread shared between the clients, otherwise we will have
a dedicated thread per client, which can cause resource utilization issues,
hitting a ulimit with the number of processes allowed per user.
> Storm Performance cannot be scaled up by adding more CPU cores
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: STORM-297
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-297
> Project: Apache Storm (Incubating)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Sean Zhong
> Labels: Performance, netty
> Fix For: 0.9.2-incubating
>
> Attachments: Storm_performance_fix.pdf,
> storm_Netty_receiver_diagram.png, storm_performance_fix.patch
>
>
> We cannot scale up the performance by adding more CPU cores and increasing
> parallelism.
> For a 2 layer topology Spout ---shuffle grouping--> bolt, when message size
> is small (around 100 bytes), we can find in the below picture that neither
> the CPU nor the network is saturated. When message size is 100 bytes, only
> 40% of CPU is used, only 18% of network is used, although we have a high
> parallelism (overall we have 144 executors)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
