Agreed. But the patch needs to be reviewed and signed off. If it is genuinely reproducible, and fixed with the patch, then I'm not opposed to doing a rapid follow-on release of 0.9.3-incubating.
But for now, there are a lot of important patches in 0.9.2-incubating (yours included) that the community has been waiting a long time for. I would like to keep the pace of releasing at least quarterly, if not more often. -Taylor > On Jun 10, 2014, at 8:50 PM, Sean Zhong <[email protected]> wrote: > > How about STORM-342? > STORM-342: Message loss, executor hang, or message disorder due to > contention in Disruptor queue under multi-thread mode > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-342? > > It looks like a big issue to me. > > >> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:58 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Unfortunately RAT turned up a bunch of licensing issues, so there will be >> a delay. I expect to have a release cut and ready for vote sometime >> tomorrow. >> >> - Taylor >> >>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:03 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> FYI... I will cut a release candidate tomorrow. >>> >>> -Taylor >>> >>>> On May 29, 2014, at 3:01 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> I’m planning on cutting a release candidate for 0.9.2 in the next day >> or so. I’d like to ask committers to review outstanding contributions that >> I’d like to see in the release. >>>> >>>> For now I only see one remaining pull request that I’d like to include: >>>> >>>> STORM-205 (Rest API for Storm UI) >>>> >>>> I’m also open to suggestions for additional JIRAs to include. >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance, >>>> >>>> - Taylor >>>> >> >>
