[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14074486#comment-14074486
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-348:
--------------------------------------

Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-storm/pull/202#discussion_r15407759
  
    --- Diff: 
storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/messaging/netty/SaslStormClientHandler.java 
---
    @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
    +/**
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +package backtype.storm.messaging.netty;
    +
    +import java.io.IOException;
    +
    +import org.jboss.netty.channel.Channel;
    +import org.jboss.netty.channel.ChannelHandlerContext;
    +import org.jboss.netty.channel.ChannelStateEvent;
    +import org.jboss.netty.channel.Channels;
    +import org.jboss.netty.channel.MessageEvent;
    +import org.jboss.netty.channel.SimpleChannelUpstreamHandler;
    +import org.slf4j.Logger;
    +import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
    +
    +import backtype.storm.Config;
    +
    +public class SaslStormClientHandler extends SimpleChannelUpstreamHandler {
    +
    +   private static final Logger LOG = LoggerFactory
    +                   .getLogger(SaslStormClientHandler.class);
    +   private Client client;
    +   long start_time;
    +   /** Used for client or server's token to send or receive from each 
other. */
    +   private byte[] token;
    +   private String topologyName;
    +
    +   public SaslStormClientHandler(Client client) throws IOException {
    +           this.client = client;
    +           start_time = System.currentTimeMillis();
    +           getSASLCredentials();
    +   }
    +
    +   @Override
    +   public void channelConnected(ChannelHandlerContext ctx,
    +                   ChannelStateEvent event) {
    +           // register the newly established channel
    +           Channel channel = ctx.getChannel();
    +
    +           LOG.info("Connection established from " + 
channel.getLocalAddress()
    +                           + " to " + channel.getRemoteAddress());
    +
    +           try {
    +                   SaslNettyClient saslNettyClient = 
SaslNettyClientState.getSaslNettyClient
    +                                   .get(channel);
    +
    +                   if (saslNettyClient == null) {
    +                           LOG.debug("Creating saslNettyClient now " + 
"for channel: "
    +                                           + channel);
    +                           saslNettyClient = new 
SaslNettyClient(topologyName, token);
    +                           
SaslNettyClientState.getSaslNettyClient.set(channel,
    +                                           saslNettyClient);
    +                   }
    +                   
channel.write(ControlMessage.SASL_TOKEN_MESSAGE_REQUEST);
    +           } catch (Exception e) {
    +                   LOG.error("Failed to authenticate with server " + "due 
to error: "
    +                                   + e);
    --- End diff --
    
    can we change this to a ", e" instead of a "+ e" that way we can get the 
stack trace in the logs too.


> (Security) Netty SASL Authentication
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-348
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-348
>             Project: Apache Storm (Incubating)
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
>            Assignee: Raghavendra Nandagopal
>              Labels: security
>         Attachments: Storm-Netty Authentication.pdf
>
>
> Currently The Netty transport does no authentication at all.  You can encrypt 
> the tuples being sent, but that is a huge performance hit for many cases that 
> do not need it.  We should support simple SASL authentication when Netty 
> first connects to an external process.  We probably want to use something 
> similar to what we do for ZK, and generate a random secret for each topology.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to