+1 for Variant 3 Julien Nioche <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2026. jan. 29., Cs, 12:37):
> +1 for *Variant 1 (small icon)* > jnioche (binding) > > On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 at 09:37, Richard Zowalla <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > The wasn’t much feedback on [1], so I am going to proceed as proposed in > > the thread: > > > > 1. We run a formal vote (var1_small vs var_3) on the list > > 2. We fine-tune the „winning“ logo (so it shows up nicely) > > 3. We proceed with the rollout. > > > > For this reason, I am going to call a VOTE to decide on the future logo > of > > Apache StormCrawler. > > > > Based on our discussion before [2], the variants under vote are Variant 1 > > (Small) and Variant 3. > > > > Here is the overview again: > > > > Variant 1 (small icon): > > > https://github.com/apache/stormcrawler-site/blob/new-logo-candidates/img/all-var1.svg > > Favicon: > > > https://github.com/apache/stormcrawler-site/blob/new-logo-candidates/img/favicon-var1.png > > > > Variant 3: > > > https://github.com/apache/stormcrawler-site/blob/new-logo-candidates/img/all.svg > > Favicon (needed to square the spider): > > > https://github.com/apache/stormcrawler-site/blob/new-logo-candidates/img/favicon-var3.png > > > > We conduct a simple majority votes (according to the usual voting rules). > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours or as long as needed. > > > > Only votes from the StormCrawler PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome > > to vote. > > The logo with at least three binding +1 votes will be chosen. > > > > Please VOTE > > > > [+1] go for {LOGO_VARIANT} > > [+0] meh, don't care > > [-1] stop, I don’t like any of the proposed logos. > > > > Gruß > > Richard > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/qf63pfzrn2m5klmfwj7cpyqlkc8pbtym > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/x2lzn9jojo9ms09cml49648y3y35rph2 > > > > >
