Hi Martin,

I will try with your samples and update on how is it going..

Thanks,
Reka

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:30 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) <[email protected]>
wrote:

>  Hi Reka, Isuru,
>
>
>
> I was testing a scenario with nested groups:
>
>
>
> “standalone” cartridge “cisco_sample_vm” (alias "c1xxx") -  not defined in
> a group, only in application
>
> group7: has a cartridge “cisco_sample_vm” (alias "c1alias71") , no
> dependencies
>
> group6: has a cartridge “cisco_sample_vm” ("c1alias61"), dependency on
> group7, "terminationBehaviour": "terminate-dependents"
>
> group5: has a cartridge “cisco_sample_vm” ("c1alias51"), dependency on
> group6, "terminationBehaviour": "terminate-dependents"
>
>
>
> startup works as expected : 1. "c1alias71", 2. "c1alias61", 3. "c1alias51”
>
>
>
> Termination shows the following:
> 1. Terminating "c1xxx" (deleting the VM through open stack UI) : member
> becomes obsolete, VM is restarted – expected
>
> 2. terminating "c1alias51": VM "c1alias51" is restarted – as expected
>
> 3. terminating "c1alias61": no change – expected result: 1. Termination of
> "c1alias51", 2. Restart of "c1alias61",
>
> 4. terminating "c1alias71": no change – expected result: 1. Termination of
> "c1alias61", 2. Termination of "c1alias51", 3. Restart of "c1alias71", 4.
> Restart of "c1alias61", 5. Restart of "c1alias51"
>
>
>
> I attached the group definitions, application definitions (I can provide
> logs with debug enabled per request, didn’t want to send them to everyone
> on the mailer)
>
>
>
> Let me know I am wrong in my assumptions or the jsons are incorrect,
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Martin
>



-- 
Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Senior Software Engineer,
WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
Mobile: +94776442007

Reply via email to