Hi Udara, No problem, I was just wondering if it is supported or not.
On the other hand we might have a real use case, let me follow up on this Thanks Martin From: Udara Liyanage [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 6:16 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [grouping][question] cartrdige type in dependency definition Hi Martin, Creating another cartridge type is just changing the type parameter of the existing cartridge json if you are using the base image approach and deploying the new json. If the requirement is only the easiness in testing, I don't think implementing this feasibility is necessary given that we are in a tight schedule. However if there is a real world use case I am OK. Touched, not typed. Erroneous words are a feature, not a typo.
