Hi Nirmal, Sorry for the late response.
Shall we keep the application alias, but remove the alias validation (we check if the alias is provided, and if not throw an error) for now, so that we can deploy applications without it? We can bring back the check once we generate all aliases based on the application alias. On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Nirmal Fernando <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Isuru, > > Thanks for the quick response. So, we do not need to define this right? > Can we get rid of this? > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Nirmal, >> >> The idea was to generate unique aliases for all subscribables (cartridges >> + groups) using the single application alias. However, still the users >> define aliases explicitly in the application definition, hence this is not >> used. >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Nirmal Fernando <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> In Application json we have application id and alias. Can someone please >>> explain the rationale behind having two application specific values (AFAIU >>> both of these are unique for an application?)? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> -- >>> Best Regards, >>> Nirmal >>> >>> Nirmal Fernando. >>> PPMC Member & Committer of Apache Stratos, >>> Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. >>> >>> Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/ >>> >>> -- >>> <http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/> >>> <http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/> >>> Thanks and Regards, >>> >>> Isuru H. >>> <http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/> >>> +94 716 358 048 <http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/>* <http://wso2.com/>* >>> >>> >>> * <http://wso2.com/>* >>> >>> >>> > > > -- > Best Regards, > Nirmal > > Nirmal Fernando. > PPMC Member & Committer of Apache Stratos, > Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. > > Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/ > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > > Isuru H. > +94 716 358 048* <http://wso2.com/>* > > > * <http://wso2.com/>* > > >
