Hi Martin, I'm sorry for the confusion, please see my comments below:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > When A is active B and K starts up, when B is active, C and D start up, > when D is active E starts up – what should the json look like: > > > > C > > / > > B > > / \ > > A D - E > > \ > > K > > > > Do I need the build the complete sequence for each startup sequence e.g. > > > > [A, B, D, E], [A, B, C], [A,K] > > > > I still not sure of the advantage this format has compared to the one we > had before ? > > > According to the above sample it would be sufficient to define it as follows: [A, B, D, E], [B,C], [A,K] We will not need to define "A" again since "A,B" are already there in the first set. Thanks -- Imesh Gunaratne Senior Technical Lead, WSO2 Committer & PMC Member, Apache Stratos
