On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:27 PM, reka thirunavukkarasu (JIRA) < [email protected]> wrote:
> > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13803969#comment-13803969] > > reka thirunavukkarasu commented on STRATOS-124: > ----------------------------------------------- > > Yah..We have to consider your thought here...In the case of automating the > cartridges using puppet or scripts, we need to pass the ports to the > cartridge instance via the payload. But we can remove the proxy port from > the portMapping element, since we can get the proxyport from LB or from the > LB cartridge definition when we introduce LB as a cartridge. > Reka, the question is will we make LB cartridges in 4.0.0 release? If not going this path would make things to not work. > > The deployment section, we will move it under the dynamic payload. So that > the user can define cartridge related deployment artifacts and other > configuration there.. > > > Remove PortMapping and deploymnet from cartridge definition > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: STRATOS-124 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-124 > > Project: Stratos > > Issue Type: Improvement > > Reporter: reka thirunavukkarasu > > Assignee: reka thirunavukkarasu > > Labels: CC, LB > > Fix For: 4.0.0 M2 > > > > > > Need to remove the portmapping from cartridge definition and handle the > portmapping in topology with the events received from LB and from the > member. > > Need to remove the deployment from the cartridge definition and handle > it in the cartridge agent level. > > > > -- > This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA > (v6.1#6144) > -- Best Regards, Nirmal Nirmal Fernando. PPMC Member & Committer of Apache Stratos, Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/
