I also agree. I think when we consider the load balancer as a stand-alone product it does not handle elasticity. Therefore the better term would be LB.
Thanks On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Lakmal Warusawithana <[email protected]>wrote: > my vote also for LB, its only doing load balancing, auto scaler mainly > care of elasticity. > > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Nirmal Fernando > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Not really :) >> >> Elastic >> Elastic Load Balancing automatically scales its request handling >> capacity to meet the demands of application traffic. Additionally, Elastic >> Load Balancing offers integration with Auto Scaling to ensure that you have >> back-end capacity to meet varying levels of traffic levels without >> requiring manual intervention. >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Lahiru Sandaruwan <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> $subject. Came across [1]. IMO we should rename our LB to ELB. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> [1] http://aws.amazon.com/elasticloadbalancing/ >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> Lahiru Sandaruwan >>> Software Engineer, >>> Platform Technologies, >>> WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com >>> lean.enterprise.middleware >>> >>> email: [email protected] cell: (+94) 773 325 954 >>> blog: http://lahiruwrites.blogspot.com/ >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/lahirus >>> linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/lahiru-sandaruwan/16/153/146 >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> Nirmal >> >> Nirmal Fernando. >> PPMC Member & Committer of Apache Stratos, >> Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. >> >> Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/ >> > > > > -- > Lakmal Warusawithana > Software Architect; WSO2 Inc. > Mobile : +94714289692 > Blog : http://lakmalsview.blogspot.com/ > >
