Thanks Pradeep! I have now started a new release build. The RC version has been set to RC4.
Thanks On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Pradeep Fernando <pradee...@gmail.com>wrote: > Yes. +1 > Removed and committed the changes... > > thanks. > > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Imesh Gunaratne <im...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Since this functionality needs more time to discuss, we will do the 4.0.0 >> TLP release without doing any code changes. Anyway we might need to remove >> the Incubator images in the dashboard. WDYT? >> >> Thanks >> >> >> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Nirmal Fernando <nirmal070...@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >>> I think we should be using existing message broker implementations >>> instead of re-inventing it. For ActiveMQ we can use its failover transport; >>> http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Imesh Gunaratne <im...@apache.org>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Please find my comments in-line: >>>> >>>> >>>>> - We got to have a health check mechanism. May be with low frequency >>>>> if what nirmal claims is true. >>>>> >>>> Yes we could make the frequency configurable. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> - What prevent us from publish/subscribe both in the health checker.. >>>>> >>>> With the current implementation we have not added a health checker to >>>> publisher as it detects a connection drop at the time it tries to publish a >>>> message. >>>> >>>> >>>>> - I am not convinced about having consumer in SM. >>>>> >>>> The problem here is there could be N number of subscribers for a given >>>> topic. Each subscriber has a health checker and each sends ping messages to >>>> the ping topic (may be we could call this "keepalive"). >>>> >>>> So if we introduce a ping message consumer it will receive all the ping >>>> messages sent by N subscribers. Now the question is, are we going to >>>> introduce a ping message consumer for each health checker instance or are >>>> we going to have one ping message consumer in a Stratos component? >>>> >>>> >>>>> - health check should be independent of other system components. >>>>> >>>> Agree >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Imesh Gunaratne >>>> >>>> Technical Lead, WSO2 >>>> Committer & PPMC Member, Apache Stratos >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards, >>> Nirmal >>> >>> Nirmal Fernando. >>> PPMC Member & Committer of Apache Stratos, >>> Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. >>> >>> Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/ >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Imesh Gunaratne >> >> Technical Lead, WSO2 >> Committer & PPMC Member, Apache Stratos >> > > > > -- > Pradeep Fernando. > http://pradeepfernando.blogspot.com/ > -- Imesh Gunaratne Technical Lead, WSO2 Committer & PPMC Member, Apache Stratos
