Hi Chris, thanks for your feedback - this was indeed a very misleading typo ;-) I addressed your comments and updated the draft report in the wiki.
Dominik On 2019/12/01 14:23:52, Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> wrote: > And perhaps fix a typo in the question: > ### Are there any issues that the IPMC or ASF Board need to be aware of? > There are no issues right now. > > If you write there now are issues, they'll definitely ask which ones (I am > assuming you wanted to say "no" issues) > > For: > ### How has the project developed since the last report? > > I'd probably mention that this is the first report and that the main work was > doing all the legal paperwork, which is now covered and that you're working > on cleaning things up (merging repos) to finally bring them to Apache. > > ### Is the PPMC managing the podling's brand / trademarks? > You didn't actually "do" the official podlingnamesearch, you created the > issue for it ... it's not yet resolved (or is it?) ... so I'd say: You > initiated the podlingnamesearch (perhaps with a date you started it on as > that might increase the pressure for the others to finish it) > > But besides that, I am totally OK with the report. > > Chris > > > > Am 01.12.19, 14:57 schrieb "Dominik Riemer" <[email protected]>: > > Thanks Philipp! > > I added to new items under "How has the project developed since the last > report" mentioning the submission of ICLAs, software grant and CCLA. > > There is now also a draft in the wiki: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/December2019#streampipes > > Dominik > > -----Original Message----- > From: Philipp Zehnder <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2019 2:50 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: December Podling Report - Draft > > Hi, > > thanks Dominik, I think the report looks good. > > Can you please add that all initial committers filed the ICLAs. Further > the software grant and CCLA were submitted. > > Cheers, > Philipp > > > On 1. Dec 2019, at 14:36, Dominik Riemer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > although I was hoping that we'll manage to complete the initial setup > > before the first board report, it is time to finish our report. > > Please have a look at the draft below and send any comments you have! > > > > Dominik > > > > ## StreamPipes > > > > StreamPipes is a self-service (Industrial) IoT toolbox to enable non- > > technical users to connect, analyze and explore (Industrial) IoT data > > streams. > > > > StreamPipes has been incubating since 2019-11-11. > > > > ### Three most important unfinished issues to address before graduating: > > > > 1. Finish the initial setup > > 2. Make a first Apache release > > 3. Grow the community > > > > ### Are there any issues that the IPMC or ASF Board need to be aware of? > > There are now issues right now. > > > > ### How has the community developed since the last report? > > All initial committers have subscribed to the new mailing list. We > > started to spread the project on Twitter and other channels to reach > > more potential community members, but currently, the main priority is > > to move the project infrastructure to Apache. > > There was also one event focused on extending the developer base: > > * We gave a talk at a meetup on "Self-Service IoT Data Analytics with > > StreamPipes" (~70 participants) > > > > ### How has the project developed since the last report? > > Most work during the last month was focused around setting up > StreamPipes: > > > > * Creation of mailing lists > > * Setting up the new StreamPipes Jira > > * We made a last pre-Apache release and started to refactor our code > > (restructuring the code base to reflect the new repository structure) > > * The website and documentation is already moved to Apache Git > > repositories, and a draft is online at streampipes.apache.org, > > however, we need to wait to "announce" the web page and forward > > traffic from the existing domains until the Git repos are all > > transferred > > * Right now, we are waiting to transfer our existing Git repos from > > the streampipes organization to the Apache organization on Github > > * We are also waiting to get admin accesss to the StreamPipes instance > > on Jira to import existing issues to the new issue tracker > > > > ### How would you assess the podling's maturity? > > Please feel free to add your own commentary. > > > > - [x] Initial setup > > - [ ] Working towards first release > > - [ ] Community building > > - [ ] Nearing graduation > > - [ ] Other: > > > > ### Date of last release: > > > > XXXX-XX-XX > > > > ### When were the last committers or PPMC members elected? > > No new committers were elected beyond the initial committers. We'll > > focus on attracting new committers once the initial setup is finished. > > > > ### Have your mentors been helpful and responsive? > > Are things falling through the cracks? If so, please list any open > > issues that need to be addressed. > > > > We would really like to thank our mentors. Chris was very helpful and > > responsive in setting up the infrastructure, and all questions we had > > on the mailing list were answered immediately by our mentors. > > > > ### Is the PPMC managing the podling's brand / trademarks? > > Are 3rd parties respecting and correctly using the podlings name and > > brand? If not what actions has the PPMC taken to correct this? Has the > > VP, Brand approved the project name? > > > > * We did an initial podling name search and created a ticket to get > > the name approved in Jira. > > > > ### Signed-off-by: > > > > - [ ] (streampipes) Christofer Dutz > > Comments: > > - [ ] (streampipes) Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > Comments: > > - [ ] (streampipes) Julian Feinauer > > Comments: > > - [ ] (streampipes) Justin Mclean > > Comments: > > - [ ] (streampipes) Kenneth Knowles > > Comments: > > > > ### IPMC/Shepherd notes: > > > > > > > > > > > >
