Hi, thank you for your answer. Do I understand it correctly that I have to call the mock driver from my code directly? So I have to define the return values of the mock driver.
Is there a way (e.g. an external service in a docker container) containing an example PLC, running based on the mock driver? So that I just have to start the docker container running the mock service. In my code I would then connect to the Mock PLC via: this.plcConnection= new PlcDriverManager().getConnection(“mock://DOCKER_SERVICE_NAME"); Cheers, Philipp > On 15. Jan 2020, at 15:51, Julian Feinauer <j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> > wrote: > > Hi, > > sorry fort he late reply... > What one can do using the Mock Driver I implemented is to ensure that your > code works by seeing if requests are sent to PLCs and received. > You find examples of the usage (especially in tests) in the OPM Module and in > the Scraper of PLC4X (just do a text search for "mock:" (as that’s the prefix > for that driver)). > Doing that you can exactly validate your implementation and then you don’t > have to test more and just rely on PLC4X that their shit works (....) __ > > Julian > > Am 12.01.20, 21:50 schrieb "Philipp Zehnder" <zehn...@fzi.de>: > > Hi, > > this is a very cool feature. Now it is possible to read multiple values > from a S7 and process them as events. > > The next steps should be to test the S7 adapter in multiple scenarios and > implement adapters for further PLCs. > Do you have any ideas how we could test adapters for other PLCs? > Currently just have a S7 for testing? > > Also Chris & Julian it would be great if you could give us some feedback > on the integration. Is there anything we could improve? > > Cheers, > Philipp > > >> On 9. Jan 2020, at 19:07, Johannes Tex <t...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> support for multiple properties (CollectionProperty) has been implemented. I >> also added the horizontal rendering property for StaticPropertyGroup and >> SelectionStaticProperty. Currently all SelectionStaticProperty will be >> renderd horizontal (Drop down menu), because we had problems with >> deserialization (UI) of the horizontal property if a SelectionStaticProperty >> is part of a StaticPropertyGroup. Maybe someone knows what the problem could >> be? (I opened an Issue STREAMPIPES-54) >> >> However the CollectionProperty is already used by the ‘PLC4X S7’ Adapter. >> Your feedback is welcome :) >> >> Johannes >> >> On 2019/11/21 07:15:45, "Johannes Tex" <johannes....@web.de> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have started to implement the new feature! >>> >>> At the StaticPropertyGroup Property I will add a new boolean property >>> *horizontalRendering*. I also will do this for the OneOfStaticProperty >>> (Single-Value-Selection), in this case horizontal rendering means that a >>> dropdown is displayed instead of a vertical list of radio buttons. >>> >>> >>> Johannes >>> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>> Von: Dominik Riemer [mailto:rie...@fzi.de] >>> Gesendet: Samstag, 16. November 2019 13:15 >>> An: dev@streampipes.apache.org >>> Betreff: Re: Add support for multiple properties in PLC4X S7 Adapter >>> >>> Hi Philipp, >>> >>> >>> >>> that's looking great! >>> >>> To implement your mockup, we need to extend the StaticPropertyGroup to allow >>> horizontal rendering of group members. We can add this along with a some >>> optimizations to the SDK's methods to create and extract static properties >>> (Chris also mentioned that complex nested static property definitions can >>> become quite complicated to model if you're not used to it). >>> >>> >>> >>> Dominik >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2019/11/16 09:48:24, Philipp Zehnder >>> <zehn...@fzi.de<mailto:zehn...@fzi.de>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> the first version of the of the PLC4X S7 adapter just supports to >>> configure one item. >>> >>>> A user provides the IP address, the runtimeName of the property, and the >>> node type as shown in the image: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> In the next version it should be possible to select multiple items, like: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> To do that we have to extend the Typescript model to support >>> CollectionStaticProperty and we also have to implement the UI component for >>> that. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Is it possible to have a StaticPropertyGroup in this collection that >>> contains the Static properties for runtime name, node and data type? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Does anyone have another solution how to display the configurations to the >>> user or are there any other configurations required? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Cheers, >>> >>>> Philipp >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> > > >
