Hi Tim,
Awesome, thanks for doing this, cleaning up some issues was a long overdue 
task. I went through the list, moved a few issues to post-1.0 and marked a few 
finished issues as done which we didn't close.
I will continue to check and move some issues in the following days. We 
probably need some rather strict triaging in case we want to release 0.90.0 in 
the near future 😉

Cheers
Dominik


-----Original Message-----
From: Tim <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 9:06 PM
To: Dev <[email protected]>
Subject: [DISCUSS] Agreeing on content of 0.90.0 release

Hi everyone,

first of all: I'm sorry for bothering you with all these JIRA notifications.
To prepare our 0.90.0 release, which will hopefully be our graduation release, 
I went through all tickets in our backlog in JIRA and added all ticket in 
status "OPEN" to the 0.90.0 release [1].
I want to use this as a basis for our discussion on what to include and what to 
postpone.
Therefore, I've added labels to tickets of which I think they should not be 
part of the next release. So I created the following labels:

* suggestion-done: tickets where already a merged PR or a lot of commit 
messages or the description indicates that this is already done [2].
* suggestion-postpone: tickets which can be resolved in one of the upcoming 
releases, but not necessarily inthe next one [3].
* suggestion-oudated: tickets that are so old that I consider them no longer 
relevant [4].
* suggestion-wip: tickets that may still be in the works [5].

So I would encourage you to review the label assignments created and the 
current release schedule for 0.90.0 and see if you agree with me.
If a ticket can be closed (be it as resolved or as won't do or whatever), I ask 
you to adjust the version flag so that our release notes for 0.90.0 don't get 
messed up.
If you disagree with my assignments, you are free to adjust them.
If you agree, just take the appropriate action (close ticket, move to next 
release), I think our 4-eyes principle is sufficient.

If you have any objections to the presented approach, feel free to discuss it 
with me.

Cheers,
Tim



[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/STREAMPIPES/versions/12352173
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STREAMPIPES-324?jql=labels%20%3D%20suggestion-done
[3]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STREAMPIPES-324?jql=labels%20%3D%20suggestion-postpone
[4]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STREAMPIPES-324?jql=labels%20%3D%20suggestion-outdated
[5]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STREAMPIPES-324?jql=labels%20%3D%20suggestion-wip

Reply via email to