I'm also in favour of this renaming.
Best
Tim
Am 03.11.2022 21:01 schrieb Dominik Riemer:
Hi,
yes, our master branch currently points to the latest release version.
I like the idea to rename "master" to "release" and "dev" to
"develop", what do you think?
Cheers
Dominik
On 2022/11/03 14:39:54 Christofer Dutz wrote:
Hi,
good point … also it tends to upset some people. Most projects settled
on “main” instead of “master”.
In the PLC4X project however we decided to call the development branch
“develop” and the banch where we merge releases “release”. This way
the branches sort of explain what they are themselves ;-)
Chris
From: Zike Yang <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, 3. November 2022 at 15:29
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [DISCUSS] What is the Master branch currently used for?
Hi all,
We use the `dev` branch as the default branch. But there still exists
the master branch.[0] And it was still updated 21 days ago. I'm
curious about what the master branch is currently used for.
I think it's better to rename the master branch to another name if it
has other usage because it will confuse developers if there is already
a default branch. Sometimes I would accidentally checkout to master
and then realize something was wrong.
What's your thought?
[0] https://github.com/apache/incubator-streampipes/tree/master
Best,
Zike Yang
