Thanks for the explanation -- that's super helpful!
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 1:58 PM Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I agree- having tested builds as well as having been RM. > > tg > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 3:37 PM Steve Blackmon <sblack...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Roman, >> >> Replying to your question from the Feb board minutes: >> >> > >> > rs: It would be great to see more details on how the upcoming >> > release is progressing and if there's anything that's blocking >> > it. >> >> The last several times I’ve tried to perform a release, I’ve gotten bogged >> down in the sheer number of integration tests and how many prerequisites >> must be present to get them all to pass at once. The development >> environment has to have many active account credentials, non expired, all in >> the right place in working copy, many docker containers running, enough >> system resources for 8 concurrent containers and the build, and still get a >> bit lucky. >> >> I think we’ve reached the point where its no longer reasonable to expect a >> release voter or the release manager to observe all the ITs under the >> contrib module tree passing in one execution. As such I’m inclined to >> reconfigure our reactor and failsafe plugin and reactor such that >> integration tests under streams-contrib no longer run except by specific >> request, and only one module at a time - i.e. if you want to extend and >> integration test the Facebook module, set up your environment to do so and >> run those tests standalone rather than as part of a full build. >> >> dev@streams is cc’ed here. Does anyone want to agree or not agree with this >> approach, and/or add your experience or ideas to the conversation? >> >> Steve >> >> P.S. With an adjustment like this made, I am confident we could cut a new >> release and complete a new release vote this quarter. >> >> On Feb 19, 2020, 2:15 PM -0600, Matt Sicker <mattsic...@apache.org>, wrote: >> > Comments: >> > >> > rs: It would be great to see more details on how the upcoming >> > release is progressing and if there's anything that's blocking >> > it. >> >> > da: There has been a theme of low activity, you say "Mailing list >> > and commit participation was low again. Adding committers and >> > growing the PMC needs to be a focus". Do you have any specific >> > ideas to tackle this? >> > >> > druggeri: Please include the date of the last committer addition as >> > well. The reporter tool can help facilitate this. >> > >> > This feedback was generated automatically by the secretary from the >> > comments made on your board report. >> > Comments that do not ask specific questions should be noted by the PMC >> > and taken into consideration as appropriate for future board reports. >> > Where a comment asks a specific question, it should be answered in your >> > next board report unless otherwise stated in the comment. >> > If you have any queries or concerns regarding any of the comments they >> > should be sent to the board@ mailing list.
