After a few more iterations I think the new binary distribution LICENSE is ready.
https://github.com/apache/streams/pull/505 I would especially appreciate feedback from those on PMC who have dealt with LICENSE/NOTICE matters on other projects. I will lazy consensus merge this in 72 hours. On Jul 1, 2020, 1:15 PM -0500, sblack...@apache.org <sblack...@apache.org>, wrote: > Hello team. After some delay I’ve got some follow-up on this: > > I have opened a PR for STREAMS-663: Fix DISCLAIMER that I believe removes > final traces of incubating references. > https://github.com/apache/streams/pull/504 > > In looking into what may be missing from LICENSE, it’s not obvious to me what > that would be. I’ve created STREAMS-664 to track this and commented there: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STREAMS-664 > > And also have created STREAMS-665 to track changes to NOTICE we may want to > make prior to our first binary/bytecode release. I am looking into that now, > examining what is and is not present in NOTICE for a handful of peer projects. > > Steve Blackmon > On Apr 28, 2020, 5:38 PM -0500, sblack...@apache.org <sblack...@apache.org>, > wrote: > > Justin, > > > > Thanks for your comment and offer to help. > > > > We are very interested in cleaning these items up sufficiently to begin > > releasing a binary distribution. We’ve resolved to do so in past > > discussions but never quite got there. > > > > I volunteer to take a first pass through based on your comments and open > > pull request(s) to move us closer in the next week. > > > > sblackmon > > On Apr 11, 2020, 9:26 PM -0500, Justin Mclean <jmcl...@apache.org>, wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Congratulations on your release. > > > > > > However, from a quick look, I can see this still needs a little work as: > > > - You're still including the incubator DISCLAIMER but are no longer an > > > incubating project > > > - You have a large number of things in NOTICE that probably should not be > > > there > > > - There seems to be a few things missing from LICENSE > > > - You mention LGPL/GPL licenses and are including that license text. From > > > a quick look, all dependencies are dual licensed so you should select the > > > more compatible license. > > > > > > I'm happy to help you in fixing these issues up if you need. > > > Kind Regards, > > > Justin
