On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Jason Letourneau <[email protected]> wrote: > So i most certainly messed this up a bit by releasing from the staging > repo prior to the IPMC vote...as Matt stated though we have the IPMC > votes in our group, so hopefully this clunky first release won't be > noticed too much...my thoughts are that starting the VOTE on general > would be appropriate now and to identify that this misstep has > occurred...any thoughts to the contrary? Or suggestions for a way > forward?
Replied in my other e-mail. I would send an e-mail to general asking for guidance. Note that it was a mistake and that you realize the IPMC as a whole needs to vote; but in this case you do have 4 +1s from IPMC members. > > Jason > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Jason Letourneau > <[email protected]> wrote: >> A question on process. As I understand, in the nexus repo I am >> supposed to release the binary as a result of our vote at this time, >> but upon re-reading your post - I am to wait and put the closed repo >> up for vote in the staging area? >> >> Jason >> >> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Matt Franklin <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Jason Letourneau >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Discussion thread for .1-incubating release of streams master POM >>> >>> Since we are nearing the end of the vote and we are still on track, I >>> just wanted to remind everyone that while in the incubator, a release >>> has two VOTES to go through. The first vote is within the project dev >>> list and requires 3 PPMC members to cast +1 in order to move on. Upon >>> success of the first vote, the second will take place on the >>> [email protected] list and requires 3 IPMC +1s for release. >>> >>> The good thing about having 3 or more mentors on an incubator project >>> is that each is also an IPMC member. This means that a successful DEV >>> list vote with 3 or more mentors casting a +1 only needs to go for a >>> lazy consensus vote to the IPMC. You can look through the general >>> list archives to see how this has worked in the past. >>> >>> -Matt
