Matt - any other thoughts on this?
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Matt Franklin <[email protected]> wrote: > Svn is preferred. I wil check to see if I have karma to configure the dist > svn for streams > > On Friday, January 18, 2013, Jason Letourneau wrote: > >> Thanks Matt - in reading the release guide - I see that we are >> supposed to have a directory on >> people.apache.org/www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator for releases (we >> don't) - I assume this is what shows up on [1] >> >> In addition, I notice that Rave uses svn to move the release around >> (i've replaced Rave with streams in the URL) [2]. >> >> Long and short of it is I am somewhat stuck on finalization - I can >> certainly ssh to people.apache.org, my question is whether i should >> download the release artifacts from nexus and scp them up, or go the >> svn route as prescribed by Rave...hints or suggestions welcomed ;) >> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator >> [2]https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/streams/sources >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Matt Franklin >> <[email protected]<javascript:;>> >> wrote: >> > Great job Jason. Nice to get an early start on the release process. >> > Just make sure you put the source package on dist[1] as well. >> > >> > -Matt >> > >> > [1]: >> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases >> > >> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> > From: Jason Letourneau <[email protected] <javascript:;>> >> > Date: Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:46 AM >> > Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Streams Master 0.1-incubating Release >> > To: [email protected] <javascript:;> >> > >> > >> > Lazy consensus reached - continuing the release. >> > >> > Jason >> > >> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Jason Letourneau >> > <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: >> >> Apache Streams is looking to release its 0.1 Master POM. Given this >> >> is our first release, I'd like to call attention to a mistake I've >> >> made by inadvertently promoting the staged artifacts on Nexus before >> >> the IPMC vote. We do have 4 IPMC members on our PPMC, however, I >> >> realize that the IPMC proper needs to have a chance to vote before >> >> staging is promoted. I apologize for this mistake. >> >> >> >> That said, below are our VOTE totals from the PPMC and podling >> >> community. If the IPMC community feels strongly that we should remove >> >> the inadvertantly promoted artifacts for this release we shall ask >> >> INFRA to do so, otherwise, I think lazy consensus on this release is >> >> fine based on our IPMC totals. >> >> >> >> IPMC Totals >> >> >> >> +1 [4] >> >> 0 [0] >> >> -1 [0] >> >> >> >> PPMC Totals (minus IPMC members) >> >> >> >> +1 [2] >> >> 0 [0] >> >> -1 [0] >> >> >> >> Community Totals >> >> >> >> +1 [1] >> >> 0 [0] >> >> -1 [0] >> >> >> >> Voting Record >> >> >> >> Craig McClanahan +1 >> >> Ate Douma +1 >> >> Matt Franklin +1 >> >> Andrew Hart +1 >> >> Steve Blackmon +1 >> >> Venkat Mahadevan +1 >> >> Jason Letourneau +1 >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> > [email protected]<javascript:;> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: >> > [email protected]<javascript:;> >>
