On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Danny Sullivan <[email protected]>wrote:
> Thanks for the info Steve. > As I understand, Kafka would take the place of the functionality of what > ActiveMQ does now. Storm would take place of what Camel does now. > I think in the long term we need to have a flexible architecture with a few implementations. The way I see it, we need collection, orchestration, processing pipeline, persistence and exposure. If there is a way that we can define each of these components loosely coupled enough to where we could have a Kafka OR AMQP routing implementation that would be ideal. I haven't thought through exactly how to do this myself, but wanted to offer that things may not be mutually exclusive.
