On 2016-09-28 00:08, John D. Ament wrote:
is there anyone on streams to object?
I don't think so, no :-)
Is this going to be more of a reboot or do we expect some amount of going
forward?
Right now, I expect or at least hope some amount of going forward.
Or depending on the outcome of some new discussions and potential interest
voiced by a member on the W3C ActivityStreams 2.0 spec group, it might even
lead to a reboot.
It is too early to tell either way.
We had a similar case recently with another podling. There was a
retirement vote, some community voices, when it came to actually reviving
they got part way through and ended up sputtering out. Its nothing against
them, its just that priorities change.
I would strongly recommend that we monitor streams for 3 months like a new
podling, just to make sure progress is happening. If no progress, or some
issues pop up, we need to all be comfortable with cutting bait on it.
I agree, and I think it is a good suggestion to switch back to a 3 monthly
reporting schedule to keep the IPMC in the loop on progress (or lack thereof).
Ate
John
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:57 PM Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote:
On 2016-09-25 12:25, Ate Douma wrote:
I'm happy to add and have Suneel join me as mentor for Apache Streams.
I can't find anything about this: Is there any formal process or voting
needed
before I make this so?
Without further feedback I'm going to assume lazy consensus and will add
Suneel as mentor for the Apache Streams podling.
I'll update the podling.xml and streams project page.
Ate
Ate
On 2016-09-23 19:51, Suneel Marthi wrote:
<eom>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
