On Nov 25, 2016 11:58 AM, "Suneel Marthi" <suneel.mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for starting this @sblackmon. > > Could we make 2 releases (both releases managed by folks != "sblackmon"). > > Since the recent 0.4 release, there have been minor bug fixes and > performance improvements, we could cut a release in the next one week - > call it 0.4.1.
I think all of the changes that have merged are suitable for a minor release. There were changes made to the facebook module translations, but those had fallen out of sync with the provider to the point that documents coming out of the 0.4 release providers were missing a ton of useful informaton. So i think we can make an exception to the a general preference to not change data schemas in a non-backwards compatible way in a minor release. +1 > > We do have a planned major release 0.5 for end of December. > > The idea is to have more frequent releases to demonstrate maturity in the > release process and each release managed by a different Release Meister. > +1 > Thoughts? > > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:35 PM, sblackmon <sblack...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Last week at ApacheCon EU I attended a walkthrough about the Apache > > Maturity Model [1] > > > > As we close in on graduation, it should be helpful to evaluate the project > > against the Maturity Model and work to close any gaps we see. > > > > To help start this effort, I’ve created a page on the wiki with a draft > > assessment, and some notes for discussion in italics. > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STREAMS/Apache+Maturity+Model+ > > Assessment+for+Streams > > > > Please take a look - if you have thoughts to contribute please do so in > > this thread or edit the wiki page directly (LMK if you need permissions to > > view or edit) > > > > Cheers, > > Steve > > > > [1] http://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project- > > maturity-model.html
