--- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have submitted a patch in commons to UrlValidator which returns a code > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28190 > > The existing isValid(value) method still works returning true/false. > > I have added isValid(Object value, boolean expandedCode) method which > returns > an integer code.
Why does it take an Object parameter instead of a String like the other isValid() method? David > > If expandedCode is false it returns a code indicating which part of the > url > is > invalid (general format, scheme, authority, path, query or fragment). > > If expandedCode is true it returns a more detailled code indicating a > more > specific error with the url. > > Niall > > Robert Leland wrote: > > > > Given that fits with the Validator framework, I know its > implementation > would be easy. The grouping of error message is also nice. > > Since we could use an int/long then I would probably group items by > powers > of two, but thats just a preference. If you have already created a patch > with the above scheme I would commit it unchanged. > > > > -Rob > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
