----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 11:52 AM Subject: Re: Validator Plugin
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Quoting Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >One issue with this is to make sure the validator DTD is up to date. > > > > > > > >The reason I say this is because the DTD appears to be missing the > > > var-jstype > > > >sub-element of the var element. Even the 1.2.0 version of the DTD on > CVS is > > > > > > >missing this. > > > > > > > >I assume it is a valid element, because even though I can't validate my > > > >document, the element is used properly when I set it. > > > > > > > > > > > I just comitted a patch. The DTD is a bit more general than I would > > > like, however trhe next 4 days are a crunch for me, but it should work. > > > Let me know if there is more problems or you know for sure how to limit > > > the variables it takes, see the comment > > > in the DTD. > > > > > > > Rob - > > > > this is a little bit broken, you need to have > > <!ELEMENT var (var-name, var-value, var-jstype*)> > > instead of > > <!ELEMENT var (var-name, var-value, var-jstype)> > > If you just want optional, you don't want *, you want ?, like so: > > <!ELEMENT var (var-name, var-value, var-jstype?)> > Oh yeah, duh...well like I said before I'm no XML guru :) Matt Bathje --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
