Neither do I. 1.2.1 isn't supposed to be a final of 1.2. It's just the new numbering scheme. It's still an alpha/beta/RC type release. Seems like a good idea to get everything nailed down in such a way you know it works before variables you don't control get introduced.
The pending changes strike me as all the more reason to get 1.2.1 out the door as soon as possible. So 1.2.2 can have all the dependency changes... Am I missing something? > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 5:34 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: RE: Struts 1.2.1 release? > > > I don't understand, so I must be missing something. What > would be the problem if Struts 1.2.1 ships with exactly the > same dependencies as 1.2.0 other than an updated Validator? > > -- > Martin Cooper > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 1:03 PM > > To: Struts Developers List > > Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.1 release? > > > > > > if you don't believe me, then please consider mailing craig > directly > > on this matter. i'm busting a gut to prevent the impending > dependency > > hell that will result if struts ships without the new commons > > releases. i've even started cutting releases again (at risk to my > > liberty and livelihood). > > > > craig helped to get this process started and knows just how > bad this > > will be without the solutions we've been working on. please > don't just > > ignore this information because it's me telling you rather than him. > > > > - robert > > > > On 6 Jun 2004, at 13:49, Ted Husted wrote: > > > > > I believe it would be better to roll Struts 1.2.1 > *before* the new > > > releases of the other Commons dependencies arrive. > > > > > > I'd like to try rolling the Commons Validator 1.1.3 tomorrow, and > > > then roll Struts 1.2.1 the next day. > > > > > > If Commons Validator 1.1.3 then goes "stable", Struts > 1.2.1 would be > > > in a position to follow suit. > > > > > > As the dominoes fall :), we can bring the Struts-Chain up from > > > contrib, reorganize the repository to better support Maven and > > > subprojects, release 1.3.0, along with the new Struts > Scripting and > > > Struts BSF subprojects, Don has waiting in the wings :) > > > > > > -Ted. > > > > > > On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 08:37:34 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > >> > > >> On 4 Jun 2004, at 23:44, Joe Germuska wrote: > > >> > > >>> Struts 1.2.1 is blocked on the full release of its commons- > > >>> validator dependency (1.1.3). Of the open bugs, by my > assessment, > > >>> only a one looks like a showstopper that should be > resolved before > > >>> a release: > > >>> > > >>> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29004 > > >>> > > >>> I reclassified some others that I definitely didn't think > > >>> classified as blockers; If you're interested in > helping, you could > > >>> look at the rest and see if you can fix them (it's fine to fix > > >>> non-blocker bugs, of course) or help confirm them or otherwise > > >>> clarify the issues. > > >>> > > >>> I think commons-validator is just blocking on someone > having time > > >>> to be the release manager. > > >>> > > >> > > >> IMHO it's not just commons-validator that's the issue any more. > > >> > > >> > > >> 1. craig is very busy right now preparing for the release of > > >> project rave at javaone> 2. over the next few weeks > there will be > > >> releases for most of the major struts and validator commons > > >> dependencies (logging, beanutils and digester). the > beanutils and > > >> digester releases are important not only for the bugs > they fix but > > >> also because they allow the removal of the commons collections > > >> dependency. this dependency is an issue now that there the 3.x > > >> series of collections releases are incompatible with the 2.x > > >> series. the logging release is important since it'll > work with the > > >> new 1.3 series of log4j releases. > > >> > > >> with a bit of luck, everything might come together. > > >> > > >> > > >> if anyone does have some free coding time and would like to push > > >> the struts release along, beanutils is the most > difficult release > > >> and some extra help would be appreciated there. > > >> > > >> - robert > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
