DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29736>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29736 ValidatorForm.validate should be able to throw ValidatorException [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX Summary|ValidatorForm.validate |ValidatorForm.validate |should be able to throw |should be able to throw |ValidatorException |ValidatorException ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-22 14:58 ------- ValidatorException is a checked exception, which means it would need to be added to the interface for ActionForm, breaking backwards compatibility with all existing ActionForm implementations, many of which don't even use Commons Validator. Arguably, we could create o.a.struts.validator.ValidatorException as a subclass of RuntimeExtension and throw that, but still, it would disrupt a lot of existing code to start throwing exceptions someplace where they were previously being caught. In the meantime, you could throw a different runtime exception from your custom plugin, or do that part of the validation in the action instead of in form.validate(). We couldn't fix this without a suggestion for a less disruptive way to handle it than changing the signature of ActionForm.validate() --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
