I believe that Michael Rasmussen submitted a patch so that Struts Faces would compile with 1.2.x, and it also required Servlet 2.3 only.
-Ted. On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 17:39:38 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > i think it will be better (perhaps for now) > to compile against servlet 2.3 > > jsf-deployment-guide tells people howto run jsf (the RI) in 1.3 or > 1.4-j2ee-containers. > > so if struts-faces is build against 2.4 > people run into problems, when they *must* > use 1.3-webcontainer (e.g. tomcat) > > on my box struts-faces from cvs (incl. patch for 2.3) runs in > tomcat5 with RI and MyFaces. > > so, i don't know the complexity of changing > on nightly-build-box the dependency from 2.4 > to 2.3 > > btw. there is another dependency in struts-faces > it builds against struts1.1 > with 1.2 there is a problem too... (it is a known issue) > FormComponent.java has a problem with method > "createDynaActionFormClass()" of class "DynaActionFormClass" > > Matthias > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 5:17 PM >> To: Struts Developers List >> Subject: RE: Struts-faces >> >> >> I imagine Craig has Struts-Faces compiling against 2.4 to make >> sure it stays in synch with Tomcat 5. >> >> But, the question is whether we want to mandate that Struts-Faces >> can only compile against 2.3 (and not 2.4)? Or vice-versa. Or is >> there a way to write the class so it compiles under either? >> >> I know this is a pain. We went through the same problem with >> DataSources between 2.2 and 2.3. I'm not sure what the issue here >> is, but for DataSources, the interface changed and we had to stub >> the new members so that they threw exceptions if called. Of >> course, the problem with that approach is it may obviate new >> functionality or rely on deprecated methods. >> >> -Ted. >> >> >> On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 14:14:02 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> >>> James, >>> >>> >>> i also guess it is the result of the commitment. i submitted >>> (first) a wrapper, that builds against 2.4 >>> >> reason is, the >>> build-porperties had *default* to 2.4 >>> >>> >>> okay ted asks for a 2.3-wrapper, so i created that candidate. >>> >>> >>> i think the wrapper should compile against 2.3 >>> since jsf is able to run in j2ee1.3-containers >>> >>> >>> So i am wondering, why struts-faces uses 2.4 >>> for compiling. >>> >>> >>> btw. the 2.3 wrapper runs on servlet2.4-containers (like >>> tomcat5.0) >>> >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>> >>>> I think it is happening because of the changes I committed >>>> >> for your >>>> fix for MyFaces. If you look at when the builds stopped, >>>> >> it's right >>>> after I made the commits on 6/29. It must be an issue of >>>> what version of servlet.jar that the >>>> HttpServletRequestWrapper class is being compiled against. Is >>>> it not possible to make that class compilable against both >>>> 2.3 and 2.4? >>>> >>>> -James >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> wessendorf.de] >>>> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 6:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Subject: Struts-faces >>>> >>>> see http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta- >>>> struts/nightly/struts- faces/ >>>> >>>> >>>> the nightly build is empty again, >>>> >>>> >>>> so is there a logfile, where i can check, why it is not build >>>> successful? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matthias Weßendorf >>>> Aechterhoek 18 >>>> DE-48282 Emsdetten >>>> Germany >>>> Email: matthias AT wessendorf DOT net >>>> URL: http://www.wessendorf.net >>>> >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> ---- --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev- >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e- >>>> mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> ---- --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev- >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e- >>>> mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> ---- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev- >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For >> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
